[Openstack-operators] FYI: Rabbit Heartbeat Patch Landed

2015-03-19 Thread Mark Voelker
At the Operator’s midcycle meetup in Philadelphia recently there was a lot of operator interest[1] in the idea behind this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146047/ Operators may want to take note that it merged yesterday. Happy testing! [1] See bottom of https://etherpad.openstack.org/

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Status of the nova-network to Neutron migration work

2015-03-27 Thread Mark Voelker
Inline… On Mar 27, 2015, at 11:48 AM, Assaf Muller wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> On 03/27/2015 05:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> >>> Part of it is corner (or simplified) use cases not being optimally >>> served by Neutron, and I think Neutron could more aggressively address >

Re: [Openstack-operators] OpenSource ELK configurations

2015-05-27 Thread Mark Voelker
Sounds like a fine thing to point people to…thanks Joe. https://github.com/osops/tools-logging/pull/3 At Your Service, Mark T. Voelker > On May 27, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > There's some stuff in the osops repo: > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] openstack vmware

2015-09-21 Thread Mark Voelker
Ignazio, > I know there is a nova driver for vmware. > I' like to know if glance, heat, ceilometer etc etc work with vmware. There are VMware drivers for Nova, Neutron (NSX and DVS, though the latter supports far fewer features), Neutron LBaaS, Cinder, and Glance. Heat and Ceilometer also wor

Re: [Openstack-operators] nova-neutron with vsphere

2015-09-24 Thread Mark Voelker
Miko, There’s a VDS driver for Neutron in addition to the NSX one that you might want to have a look at if you haven’t already. Some notes on that here (these are from the admin guides for the VMware Integrated OpenStack distribution as it does a pretty good job of describing the requirements,

Re: [Openstack-operators] nova-neutron with vsphere

2015-09-24 Thread Mark Voelker
> Official Mirantis partner for OpenStack Training > https://www.create-net.org/community/openstack-training > > -- > Dr. Federico M. Facca > > CREATE-NET > Via alla Cascata 56/D > 38123 Povo Trento (Italy) > > P +39 0461 312471 > M +39 334 6049758 > E federi

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Mark Voelker
FWIW, the most popular client libraries in the last user survey[1] other than OpenStack’s own clients were: libcloud (48 respondents), jClouds (36 respondents), Fog (34 respondents), php-opencloud (21 respondents), DeltaCloud (which has been retired by Apache and hasn’t seen a commit in two year

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-29 Thread Mark Voelker
Mark T. Voelker > On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: > > > > I agree with John Griffith. I don't have any empirical evidences to back > my "feelings" on that one but it's true that we weren't enable to enable > Cinder v2 until now. > > Which makes me wonder: When can we actu

Re: [Openstack-operators] vmware nsx 6

2016-02-17 Thread Mark Voelker
Hi Ignazio, I have. =) Drop me a note and let me know what you need; we’ll be happy to help. For a general background, this is a good place to start: http://blogs.vmware.com/openstack/openstack-networking-with-vmware-nsx-part-1/ http://blogs.vmware.com/openstack/openstack-networking-with-vmwa

Re: [Openstack-operators] vmware nsx 6

2016-02-17 Thread Mark Voelker
n't any section to add the node as a Hypervisor, > probably because this document is related to a NSX multi hypervisor version. > > So the question is: must we wait for a new nsx multi hypervisor version or we > can use the current nsx version ? > > Best Regards >

Re: [Openstack-operators] vmware nsx 6

2016-02-18 Thread Mark Voelker
re thing, glad to be of assistance! At Your Service, Mark T. Voelker > > Regards > > Ignazio > > > > 2016-02-17 20:45 GMT+01:00 Mark Voelker : > >> > >> Hi Ignazio, > >> > >> Sure, NSXv 6.2.1 is usable for a VMware region [1]. Sou

Re: [Openstack-operators] Next Ops Midcycle NYC August 25-26

2016-06-22 Thread Mark Voelker
Hi Ops, FYI for those that may not be aware, that’s also the week of OpenStack East. OpenStack East runs August 23-24 also in New York City (about ~15-20 minutes away from Civic Hall by MTA at the Playstation Theater). If you’re coming to town for the Ops Midcycle, you may want to make a week

Re: [Openstack-operators] Next Ops Midcycle NYC August 25-26

2016-06-22 Thread Mark Voelker
e distance. > > Matt > > On 22 June 2016 at 14:58, Mark Voelker wrote: > Hi Ops, > > FYI for those that may not be aware, that’s also the week of OpenStack East. > OpenStack East runs August 23-24 also in New York City (about ~15-20 minutes > away from Civic Hall by MTA

Re: [Openstack-operators] Next Ops Midcycle NYC August 25-26

2016-06-23 Thread Mark Voelker
some more info when I have it. At Your Service, Mark T. Voelker > On Jun 22, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Mark Voelker wrote: > > It would definitely be cool to have more ops folks attend both events. I’d > be happy to check in with the rest of the organizers and see if there’s a >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Next Ops Midcycle NYC August 25-26

2016-07-08 Thread Mark Voelker
Hi Folks, /me returns from a near-internet-less weeklong road trip... Since it seems we’re a bit behind getting registration set up for the midcycle and I’ve had a few folks reach out that need to get travel finalized: if you missed the earlybird registration for OpenStack East and are planning

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [keystone][defcore][refstack] Removal of the v2.0 API

2017-03-02 Thread Mark Voelker
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 6:01 PM, Rodrigo Duarte wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > During the PTG, Morgan mentioned that there was the possibility of keystone > removing the v2.0 API [0]. This thread is a follow up from that discussion to > make sure we loop in t

[Openstack-operators] [tc][qa][all]Potential New Interoperability Programs: The Current Thinking

2017-06-09 Thread Mark Voelker
Hi Everyone, Happy Friday! There have been a number of discussions (at the PTG, at OpenStack Summit, in Interop WG and Board of Directors meetings, etc) over the past several months about the possibility of creating new interoperability programs in addition to the existing OpenStack Powered pr