C7v2 here. 21.02
eth0: 73
eth1: 72 (br-lan)
wlan0: 71 (11n+ac, 5GHz)
wlan1: 72 (11bgn, 2.4GHz)
Works fine as is.
On 2021-11-15 21:04, e9hack wrote:
Hi,
I'm using two tp-link routers. Both are using the same mac address for
one eth and one wlan interface:
archer c7-v2:
uboot
only at IPv6 layer the PMTU is reduced. possibly something similar
occuring at IPv6. Is it possible something unusual is happening in 6in4
or lower?
On 2021-11-04 23:04, Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
On 11/4/21 11:52 AM, Paul D wrote:
Having a bit of IPv6 6in4 problem. I set a static MTU to 1480
Clarification: I ping6 the next ipv6 hop after my 6in4 tunnel, to rule
out PMTU being at fault.
On 2021-11-04 16:52, Paul D wrote:
Having a bit of IPv6 6in4 problem. I set a static MTU to 1480 locally
and remotely (HE tunnel).
___
openwrt-devel
Having a bit of IPv6 6in4 problem. I set a static MTU to 1480 locally
and remotely (HE tunnel).
As I interpret the RFC [1] as referenced by overarching RFC [2], it notes:
> When using the static tunnel MTU, the Don't Fragment bit MUST NOT be
> set in the encapsulating IPv4 header. As a
If I use js e.g. :
o = ss.option(form.TextValue, 'blah', _('blah'), _('blah.'));
o.optional = true;
o.monospace = true;
And add either:
o.width = "500px";
or:
o.width = "60ch";
I do not get the desired effect. Is this normal?
Here (
The below is a fairly prescient analysis of the situation, and a good
approach, Rui. I think openwrt will be fine staying put on iptables,
until bpfilter matures. I think I have about 20 individual rules on my
FW. Having the capability is nice, but most home users probably don't
have or need
Wise words from the experienced!
If making a yearly release is unattainable, isn't making point releases
more achievable? Even if it's adding a single commit, point releases
send a signal to the outside world that the project is still active, and
e.g. that security is in focus. Any point
On 2021-10-05 21:17, Rich Brown wrote:
On Oct 5, 2021, at 10:24 AM, Paul D wrote:
Write this up into an FAQ/howto on openwrt.org (this is, after all, the OWRT
way)
Yes, it's always more powerful (and useful) to tell people what TO do, instead
of what NOT to do.
I contribute very
Roughly
Write this up into an FAQ/howto on openwrt.org (this is, after all, the
OWRT way)
Link to it in a
https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/defining-the-mergeability-of-pull-requests/troubleshooting-required-status-checks
which looks
Overwrite or override? Seems like override - distinction here is
important...
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Did not understand significance of vendorclass.
Should this give a new option for uci, match_tag?
On 2021-09-23 09:28, Paul Fertser wrote:
A set of tags can be specified for --dhcp-host option to restrict the
assignment to the requests which match all the tags.
Example usage:
config
On 2021-09-17 13:27, Perry wrote:
Hi all,
On 9/17/21 1:30 PM, Rich Brown wrote:
Hi Arınç
On Sep 17, 2021, at 3:17 AM, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
The current naming used on LuCI/UCI is inaccurate and confusing. The
“interfaces” under Network → Interfaces actually represent networks. The actual
Someone more experienced than I am might have a good answer.
How trivial is it to patch openwrt 21 and/or master in one place, such
that my brX/br-lan has the flag SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE if the
underlying hardware/eth driver also has it?
I would like to run ptp4l on my bridge
ch.
Trials and errors worked well in other cases but I guess this time they
may not.
Side note: recovery ath79 image is accepted via tftp.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Paul D wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:16:54
From: Paul D
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: ath79 porting of NEt
On 2021-08-16 17:24, Enrico Mioso wrote:
Hello all!!
It's me, again trying to port a device to ath79. And guess where I am
stuck ... in the Ethernet part and switch configuration. :)
The device runs ar71xx, I have the io package installed.
I can get replies from the device, but ping
https://www.fragattacks.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20210511180259.159598-1-johan...@sipsolutions.net/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
