Hello Ben,
On 04.03.19 18:49, Ben Greear wrote:
> I've stopped any serious development on my 4.19 kernel, and am mostly
> using 4.20 now. So, might be worth moving OpenWRT ath10k-ct to use the
> 4.20
> kernel if it is not already doing so?
I thought about the same - as OpenWRT 19.x is set to be
I've stopped any serious development on my 4.19 kernel, and am mostly
using 4.20 now. So, might be worth moving OpenWRT ath10k-ct to use the 4.20
kernel if it is not already doing so?
Thanks,
Ben
On 3/4/19 9:03 AM, David Bauer wrote:
This backports upstream commit
34d5629 ath10k: limit
This backports upstream commit
34d5629 ath10k: limit available channels via DT ieee80211-freq-limit
to the 4.19 ath10k-ct version. Without this patch, disabled channels
are still listed as a supported configuration for the radio.
The identical patch was also backported by OpenWRT to the non-ct