Hi Michael,
> well, it seems that the second commit did not survive (at least in master
> branch)...
indeed, it was broken by an improperly rebased commit:
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commitdiff;h=5209cfa534293cb6d27574b51d03bd69a5defb0c
I'd be fine with a v2 which reintro
Hi,
> the "tty" group has been introduced exactly for this purpose some time
> ago (1)(2). Any reason why we need "dialout" as well?
>
> ~ Jo
>
> 1:
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commitdiff;h=5523ee3459a2d3
> 46ad068ce359cdb60dcda1239d 2:
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt
Hi,
the "tty" group has been introduced exactly for this purpose some time
ago (1)(2). Any reason why we need "dialout" as well?
~ Jo
1:
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commitdiff;h=5523ee3459a2d346ad068ce359cdb60dcda1239d
2:
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=comm
This add that "well-known" group to the system database and changes
hotplug default rules to assign /dev/tty[A-Za-z]+[0-9]+ nodes
to this new group.
Background is to allow more fine-granulated permissions, e.g.
for daemons like ser2net which make UART ports available via network
and thus should no