I'm a little late to respond, but...
RAC is most certainly a significant upgrade to and renaming of OPS. There
is absolutely no doubt about it. At Oracle Open World 2000, all the Oracle
OPS people doing presentations found out about the name change only a few
weeks before the conference and scr
2 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: 9i standby
>
>
>
> Mark Leith wrote:
>
> > No it is not the upgrade of OPS as I understand. They even
> put OPS down
> > themselves saying that it was sparsely used, and far to
> complicated to set
Mark Leith wrote:
> No it is not the upgrade of OPS as I understand. They even put OPS down
> themselves saying that it was sparsely used, and far to complicated to set
> up.
Th king is dead; long live the king! OPS was sparsely used, so they
renamed it. I'm reading a book about the Communist s
Brian,
They didn't actually say what hardware they ran on other than "Compaq".
There was a little discussion about this after the actual presentation with
other attendees also, but I shouldn't get too worried about de-support of
this solution at all. The actual day was an Oracle/Compaq release da
No it is not the upgrade of OPS as I understand. They even put OPS down
themselves saying that it was sparsely used, and far to complicated to set
up.
What RAC does, is essentially link every machine together in to a "cluster",
then each physical machine can touch the same database concurrently
(
Mark, isn't RAC just the upgrade for OPS? Then that would
make it a 'standby' for the instance, but not a standby for the
database, no?
Am I misunderstanding something?
y
Mark Leith wrote:
> I attended the Oracle 9i opening yesterday at Oracle HQ in the UK, and one
> of the main points they d
Mark -
I saw the same presentation @ IOUG. Do you recall if they were running on the
Compaq Alphas? A few days ago I recall someone saying that they would be wary
of Oracle continuing support for Oracle on the Alpha chip, since Compaq has
pretty much written it off.
Brian
Mark Leith wrote:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 6:56 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: 9i standby
>
>
> "Gogala, Mladen" wrote:
> >
> > Replication happens in discrete chunks and there is a
> distinct possibility
> >
I attended the Oracle 9i opening yesterday at Oracle HQ in the UK, and one
of the main points they discussed about 9i, was the use of Real Application
Clusters (RAC). Of course you have to be running on Compaq hardware at the
moment, but it takes the need for a standby away, as you essentially jus
Can you tell us please what are specifics in configuring database for such
load.
Alex Hillman
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 6:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Properly designed and configured replication
environments, especially on 8i+, can handle a
phe
"Gogala, Mladen" wrote:
>
> Replication happens in discrete chunks and there is a distinct possibility
> of losing data if replication was used in banks. Banks and other financial
> institutions are using OPS with EMC or DiskShark (IBM) based remote
> replication
Hmmm. Banks are two different w
there is a presentation on high availability
there that you can sign up for (free registration) and it talks about this.
Rachel
>From: "JOE TESTA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject:
Any papers/books you can recommend on getting it 'right'?
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Properly designed and configured replication
environments, especially on 8i+, can handle a
phenomenal transaction level. I've work
Properly designed and configured replication
environments, especially on 8i+, can handle a
phenomenal transaction level. I've worked with sites
that replicate 20GB+ a day and db performance is
excellent. On the other hand, I've also worked with
sites that were such a mess that replicating 100MB
Replication happens in discrete chunks and there is a distinct possibility
of losing data if replication was used in banks. Banks and other financial
institutions are using OPS with EMC or DiskShark (IBM) based remote
replication
facilities. I know that Oxford Health Plans uses 4-way parallel serv
: JOE TESTA
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 1:06
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re:
9i standby
Page 61 of Oracle 9i, Data Guard concept.pdf
says the standby can be in one of 2 states, open for
read-only or in managed recovery mode. i
Most of the high-volume replicated sites that I have heard of over the past few years
use Quest's Shareplex. I've had no experience with Clustra.
Brian
--
--
| Brian McGraw -- Oracle DBA |
| Central Alabama Oracle Users Group |
|--
Thanks. If anyone else knows of anything out there for really high volume replication
over
a WAN it would be appreciated. I was under the impression that banks, credit card
companies, and
telephone companies were replicating there data using Oracle but it doesn't look like
it.
Anyone know what
I don't think so. My understanding was that you may open
the standby in read only mode, but I don't think that
you can have the database open in the read only mode
and apply logs at the same time. Not before oracle 12j,
anyway.
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:26 PM
To:
Page 61 of Oracle 9i, Data Guard concept.pdf
says the standby can be in one of 2 states, open for read-only
or in managed recovery mode. if its open in read only, it can't have logs
applied. I've not gotten around to testing that 9i concept yet.
although it looks like it will be kewl to
Anyone know if the standby in 9i can be in readonly mode while the logs are
being applied? I've heard about this as being the case and also that this isn't
the case.
Thanks, Dave Turner
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: David Turner
INET: [EMAIL PROTE
21 matches
Mail list logo
