Hi，TongHao and Ilya
this patch was reported at
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2020-August/050489.html
and it was fixed by patch 1f3a090（"net: openvswitch: introduce common code for
flushing flows"）
Best regards, Wentao Jia
Hi，TongHao and Ilya
I guess this bug was fixed
Hi，TongHao and Ilya
I guess this bug was fixed by patch 1f3a090（"net: openvswitch:
introduce common code for flushing flows"），but this patch is not
for fix bug use-after-free flow mask
Best regards, Wentao Jia >> On 3/24/22 05:17, Wentao Jia wrote: >> > >> > >> >
on destroy flow table instan
References: <20220324214158.137613-1-svc.eng.git-m...@nutanix.com>
Bleep bloop. Greetings svc.eng.git-mail, I am a robot and I have tried out
your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line lacks
Hi,
I’ve updated the patch and sent out v6. There was a memory leak in ovn-nbctl.c
which is fixed now. Hopefully the build should pass now.
Thank you,
Karthik C
On 3/24/22, 9:27 AM, "Lorenzo Bianconi" wrote:
> From: Karthik Chandrashekar
> mailto:karthi...@nutanix.com>>
>
> Add a new NB and S
From: Karthik Chandrashekar
Add a new NB and SB table for managing Static MAC_Binding entries.
This table is currently supported for logical routers. OVN northd
is responsible for propagating the values from NB to SB. OVN controller
is responsible for installation MAC lookup flows. The priority o
Thanks Numan.
Regards,
Vladislav Odintsov
> On 24 Mar 2022, at 17:54, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 2:33 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>>
>> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> I applied this patch to the main branch and backported upto branch-21.03.
>
> Numan
>> O
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 4:47 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Hi Numan,
>
> This message got buried in my inbox, so sorry about only replying now. I
> have some replies in-line below
>
> On 3/18/22 16:34, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:38 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
> >>
> >> Commit
Hi Numan,
This message got buried in my inbox, so sorry about only replying now. I
have some replies in-line below
On 3/18/22 16:34, Numan Siddique wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:38 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
Commit 4deac4509abbedd6ffaecf27eed01ddefccea40a introduced functionality
in ovn-no
On 3/24/22 12:32, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 3/10/22 21:49, Mark Michelson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson
---
NEWS | 2 +-
debian/changelog | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 9f3ce3cf3..0f8e068b1 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NE
On 2/17/22 23:13, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 2/17/22 19:45, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> Ilya Maximets (2):
>> Set release date for 2.17.0.
>> Prepare for 2.17.1.
>>
>> NEWS | 7 ++-
>> configure.ac | 2 +-
>> debian/changelog | 8 +++-
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
Hello Ilya,
Ilya Maximets writes:
> 'conntrack - DNAT load balancing' test fails from time to time
> because not all the group buckets are getting hit.
>
> In short, the test creates a group with 3 buckets with the same
> weight. It creates 12 TCP sessions and expects that each bucket
> will be
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets
> Sent: Thursday 24 March 2022 11:20
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Aaron Conole ; Phelan, Michael
> ; Ilya Maximets
> Subject: [PATCH] system-traffic.at: Fix flaky DNAT load balancing test.
>
> 'conntrack - DNAT load balancing' test fail
On 24/03/2022 16:35, Jan Scheurich wrote:
Hi Kevin,
This was a bit of a misunderstanding. We didn't check your RFC patch carefully
enough to realize that you had meant to encompass our cross-numa-polling
function in that RFC patch. Sorry for the confusion.
I wouldn't say we are particularly k
Hi Kevin,
This was a bit of a misunderstanding. We didn't check your RFC patch carefully
enough to realize that you had meant to encompass our cross-numa-polling
function in that RFC patch. Sorry for the confusion.
I wouldn't say we are particularly keen on upstreaming exactly our
implementati
On 3/10/22 21:49, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson
> ---
> NEWS | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> index 9f3ce3cf3..0f8e068b1 100644
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -O
References: <20220324161239.61857-1-sangana.abhi...@nutanix.com>
Bleep bloop. Greetings Abhiram Sangana, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line is 275 ch
Currently, if multiple distributed gateway ports (DGP) are configured
on a logical router, NAT is disabled as part of commit 15348b7
(northd: Multiple distributed gateway port support.)
This patch adds a new column called "gateway_port" in NAT table that
references a distributed gateway port in th
Hi All,
This meeting is a follow up to the call earlier this week.
This week Sunil presented 3 different approaches to integrating DMA-Dev with
OVS along with the performance impacts.
https://github.com/Sunil-Pai-G/OVS-DPDK-presentation-share/blob/main/OVS%20vhost%20async%20datapath%20design%20
On 24 Mar 2022, at 12:20, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> 'conntrack - DNAT load balancing' test fails from time to time
> because not all the group buckets are getting hit.
>
> In short, the test creates a group with 3 buckets with the same
> weight. It creates 12 TCP sessions and expects that each bu
Hi Anurag,
On 16/03/2022 12:29, Anurag Agarwal wrote:
Hello Kevin,
Thanks for your inputs.
In this scenario we have one VM each on NUMA0 and NUMA1 (VM1 is on NUMA0, VM2
is on NUMA1), dpdk port is on NUMA1.
Without cross-numa-polling, VM/VHU queue traffic is evenly distributed based on
Hi Anurag/Jan,
On 21/03/2022 09:42, Anurag Agarwal wrote:
From: Jan Scheurich
Today dpif-netdev considers PMD threads on a non-local NUMA node for
automatic assignment of the rxqs of a port only if there are no local,
non-isolated PMDs.
On typical servers with both physical ports on o
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 2:33 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>
Thanks.
I applied this patch to the main branch and backported upto branch-21.03.
Numan
> On 3/22/22 13:37, Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
> > If rpm is built with libcapng (default), /etc/logrotate.d/ovn
> > confi
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:31 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Last month, commit d7514abe1 (acl-log: Log the direction (logical
> pipeline) of the matching ACL.) was added to the main branch of OVN.
> This commit was made because of the issue report at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 3:09 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
>
> Ensure that if there are no local numa PMD thread
> cores available that pmd cores from all other non-local
> numas will be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor
Acked-by: David Marchand
--
David Marchand
_
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:32 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 3/24/22 05:17, Wentao Jia wrote:
> >
> >
> > on destroy flow table instance, referenced flow mask may be released
> > too. fuction ovs_flow_tbl_destroy(), release flow mask first and then
> > destroy flow table instance. this will trigger
'conntrack - DNAT load balancing' test fails from time to time
because not all the group buckets are getting hit.
In short, the test creates a group with 3 buckets with the same
weight. It creates 12 TCP sessions and expects that each bucket
will be used at least once. However, there is a solid
On 3/24/22 05:17, Wentao Jia wrote:
>
>
> on destroy flow table instance, referenced flow mask may be released
> too. fuction ovs_flow_tbl_destroy(), release flow mask first and then
> destroy flow table instance. this will trigger kernel panic on detroy
> datapath
>
>
> [ 377.647756] kernel B
On 3/23/22 17:24, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 3/23/22 17:11, Adrian Moreno wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/23/22 14:25, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>> One small nit in patch 4, the rest of the changes from v4 to v5 look good.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry about that. Dumitru said he might take a look at the latest version.
>> I'
On 3/23/22 12:56, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Use multi-variable iteration helpers to rewrite rculist loops macros.
>
> There is an important behavior change compared with the previous
> implementation: When the loop ends normally (i.e: not via "break;"),
> the object pointer provided by the user is NU
On 3/23/22 12:56, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Re-write hindex's loops using multi-variable helpers.
>
> For safe loops, use the LONG version to maintain backwards
> compatibility.
>
> Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno
> ---
Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara
___
On 3/23/22 12:56, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Re-write cmap's loops using multi-variable helpers.
>
> For iterators based on cmap_cursor, we just need to make sure the NODE
> variable is not used after the loop, so we set it to NULL.
>
> Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno
> ---
On 3/23/22 12:56, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Rewrite hmap's loops using multi-variable helpers.
>
> For SAFE loops, use the LONG version of the multi-variable macros to
> keep backwards compatibility.
>
> Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno
> ---
Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara
_
On 3/23/22 12:56, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Use multi-variable iteration helpers to rewrite non-safe loops.
>
> There is an important behavior change compared with the previous
> implementation: When the loop ends normally (i.e: not via "break;"), the
> object pointer provided by the user is NULL. Th
On 3/23/22 12:56, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Safe version of multi-variable iterator helpers declare an internal
> variable to store the next value of the iterator temporarily.
>
> Two versions of the macro are provided, one that still uses the NEXT
> variable for backwards compatibility and a shorter
On 3/23/22 12:56, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> Multi-variable loop iterators avoid potential undefined behavior by
> using an internal iterator variable to perform the iteration and only
> referencing the containing object (via OBJECT_CONTAINING) if the
> iterator has been validated via the second expres
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:12 PM Mike Pattrick wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:54 AM Christophe Fontaine
> wrote:
> >
> > This config param allows the delivery of broadcast and multicast packets
> > to the secondary interface of non-lacp bonds, identical to the same option
> > for kernel bo
36 matches
Mail list logo
