Hi Darrell.
Comments inline and I'm sorry for late responses once again.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
On 13.04.2017 00:28, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
> On 4/3/17, 8:04 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ilya
> Maximets" i.maxim...@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, once crea
On 4/3/17, 8:04 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ilya
Maximets"
wrote:
Currently, once created device in dpdk will exist forever
even after del-port operation untill we manually call
'ovs-appctl netdev-dpdk/detach ', where is not
the port's name but the name
Ilya Maximets writes:
> Currently, once created device in dpdk will exist forever
> even after del-port operation untill we manually call
> 'ovs-appctl netdev-dpdk/detach ', where is not
> the port's name but the name of dpdk eth device or pci address.
>
> Few issues with current implementation:
Currently, once created device in dpdk will exist forever
even after del-port operation untill we manually call
'ovs-appctl netdev-dpdk/detach ', where is not
the port's name but the name of dpdk eth device or pci address.
Few issues with current implementation:
1. Different API for usua
