On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Yifeng Sun wrote:
> Yes, exactly.
>
> Thanks,
> Yifeng
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, William Tu wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Yifeng Sun
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The above packet hex is supposed to be generated by linux native tunnel.
>>> But s
Yes, exactly.
Thanks,
Yifeng
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, William Tu wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Yifeng Sun
> wrote:
>
>> The above packet hex is supposed to be generated by linux native tunnel.
>> But since native tunnel conflicts with openvswitch kernel module, so we
>>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Yifeng Sun wrote:
> The above packet hex is supposed to be generated by linux native tunnel.
> But since native tunnel conflicts with openvswitch kernel module, so we
> don't add native tunnel but just send simulated packets to OVS.
>
> The ERSPAN implementation o
The above packet hex is supposed to be generated by linux native tunnel.
But since native tunnel conflicts with openvswitch kernel module, so we
don't add native tunnel but just send simulated packets to OVS.
The ERSPAN implementation of OVS is still tested on br0 and br-underlay.
In this test, br
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Yifeng Sun wrote:
> Introduce a new test that doesn't setup native erspan v2 tunnels but sends
> simulated raw packets.
> This test is supposed to only run for kernel version from 4.4.x to 4.15.x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Sun
> ---
> tests/system-traffic.at | 4
