Can you provide the command and options that you used? I assume it was
ovs-vsctl.
--Justin
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 8:11 PM, Chris Boley wrote:
>
> Justin I set the value at 5000
> I tried it via my interfaces file stanza and also by way of the
> extra-options: in a live command.
> It produced
Ben if you could suggest how I can assist you in reproduction of the
unusual behavior I’d be happy to share anything I can with you or help out
in any way that I can.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:17 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 08:57:45PM -0500, Chris Boley wrote:
> > bond-rebalance
Justin I set the value at 5000
I tried it via my interfaces file stanza and also by way of the
extra-options: in a live command.
It produced no errors in either method but when I look at the bridge, there
it is.. 1 every time.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:06 PM Justin Pettit wrote:
> It should w
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 08:57:45PM -0500, Chris Boley wrote:
> bond-rebalance-interval=1
>
> If I set this option to any other setting such as 5000 for example it
> always shows 1 on the output of an sudo ovs-vsctl list port vbond0
> command.
That is an unusual behavior, which surprises m
It should work. How are you setting it?
--Justin
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:57 PM, Chris Boley wrote:
>
> bond-rebalance-interval=1
>
> If I set this option to any other setting such as 5000 for example it always
> shows 1 on the output of an sudo ovs-vsctl list port vbond0 command.
>
bond-rebalance-interval=1
If I set this option to any other setting such as 5000 for example it
always shows 1 on the output of an sudo ovs-vsctl list port vbond0
command.
My version is 2.5.2. Is this rebalance interval negotiated between the
Cisco etherchannel that I am peering with happ
Hi Ben and Bill,
Thanks for your reply.
Controller-to-switch messages can be handled by maintaining a cache of
outstanding xid mappings.
Controller state and async messages handling is a problem. I think the
proxy can maintain an internal state for each controller, remain
ROLE_EQUAL to switches,
Ok, I've just sent a patch and if you're not convinced we can
just do the 2x change. Thanks a lot!
Daniel
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I guess I wouldn't object.
>
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:11:11PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
> > Thanks Ben and Mark. I'd be oka
On 03/08/2018 02:54 PM, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
I agree with you Mark. I tried to check how much it would shrink with
1800 ports in the system:
[stack@ovn ovs]$ sudo ovn-nbctl list Logical_Switch_Port | grep uuid | wc -l
1809
[stack@ovn ovs]$ sudo ovn-sbctl list Logical_Flow | grep uuid |
I guess I wouldn't object.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:11:11PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
> Thanks Ben and Mark. I'd be okay with 2x.
> Don't you think that apart from that it can still be good to compact after
> a
> certain amount of time (like 1 day) if the number of transactions is > 0
Thanks Ben and Mark. I'd be okay with 2x.
Don't you think that apart from that it can still be good to compact after
a
certain amount of time (like 1 day) if the number of transactions is > 0
regardless of the size?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It would be trivial to chang
It would be trivial to change 4x to 2x. 4x was just the suggestion in
the Raft thesis. If 2x would make everyone a little more comfortable,
let's make that change.
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/lis
I agree with you Mark. I tried to check how much it would shrink with 1800
ports in the system:
[stack@ovn ovs]$ sudo ovn-nbctl list Logical_Switch_Port | grep uuid | wc -l
1809
[stack@ovn ovs]$ sudo ovn-sbctl list Logical_Flow | grep uuid | wc -l
50780
[stack@ovn ovs]$ ls -alh ovn*.db
-rw-r--
Most of the data in this thread has been pretty easily explainable based
on what I've seen in the code compared with the nature of the data in
the southbound database.
The southbound database tends to have more data in it than other
databases in OVS, due especially to the Logical_Flow table. T
Hi Xiao,
You are proposing an OpenFlow proxy that passively accepts connections from
OF switches, and feeds them upwards to multiple active/passive controller
clients C1 and C2. You want to use ovs-ofctl as one of these clients.
ovs-ofctl would make an active connection to the proxy to get access
Ok, that answers my question. Thank you.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 11:13 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> No. A JSON object can have any number of members.
>
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:06:21AM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote:
> > Thanks Ben for clarification. So it means one Monitor request can request
> > for only
No. A JSON object can have any number of members.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:06:21AM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote:
> Thanks Ben for clarification. So it means one Monitor request can request
> for only one Table monitoring, correct?
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > is a
Thanks Ben for clarification. So it means one Monitor request can request
for only one Table monitoring, correct?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> is a JSON object. A JSON object maps from keys to
> values, so we only need one.
>
> Your specification for is wrong because it
is a JSON object. A JSON object maps from keys to
values, so we only need one.
Your specification for is wrong because it says that
it is a JSON array. It is not.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:32:06PM -0800, Anil Jangam wrote:
> Hello Ben,
>
> I have one more observation. I request you to pleas
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:43:50PM +, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> Ok, looking at the code, it seems like we may only need to do this?
>
> diff --git a/utilities/ovs-vsctl.c b/utilities/ovs-vsctl.c
> index 21fa18d..2ac60bf 100644
> --- a/utilities/ovs-vsctl.c
> +++ b/utilities/ovs-vsctl.c
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 07:51:23PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> In my experience, one thing I feel inconvenient is that some switches
> don't support controller-initiated connections. It would be helpful
> for testing and debugging if ovs-ofctl could be used.
> I'd propose an openflow proxy which is
Hi Ian,
We are using libvirt. I just checked by following the steps. But still we are
facing the same issue.
Attaching the XML.
Thank you.
Regards
Anirudh
From: "Stokes, Ian" mailto:ian.sto...@intel.com>>
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 8:02 PM
To: Anirudh Chanagiri
mailto:anirudh.chanag...@rive
Ok, looking at the code, it seems like we may only need to do this?
diff --git a/utilities/ovs-vsctl.c b/utilities/ovs-vsctl.c
index 21fa18d..2ac60bf 100644
--- a/utilities/ovs-vsctl.c
+++ b/utilities/ovs-vsctl.c
@@ -1018,7 +1018,9 @@ static struct cmd_show_table cmd_show_tables[] = {
&ovsre
Thanks,
I didn't spot anything out of place in the logs.
Are you using QEMU or Libvirt to start the VM? If Qemu could you share the
command used to launch the VM, if it's libvirt can you confirm you've followed
the steps for
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/topics/dpdk/vhost-user/#adding-
Hi Riccardo,
So the issue you are seeing is not related to the VSI queue setup as previously
mentioned. The issue you see is specific to the use of the i350 VF with OVS it
seems.
Specifically, OVS attempts to set the MTU of a given device (in this case the
SRIOV VF from an i350 interface known
Hi all
I have a question about a performance in a specific use case, and any
suggestions how to improve it. Use case:
Host runs Fedora 23, with kernel 4.4, ovs 2.7.2 and dpdk 16.11. There are
few interfaces: first one does not support DPDK, all others support it.
Tested topology:
port 1 ---> ovs
Hi all,
In my experience, one thing I feel inconvenient is that some switches
don't support controller-initiated connections. It would be helpful
for testing and debugging if ovs-ofctl could be used.
I'd propose an openflow proxy which is responsible for accepting and
maintaining connections from
When setting up central node on a BM with latest ovs 2.9 on ubuntu 16.04
with any tunnel type(stt/geneve), there is tunnel port not found warning on
the central node along with drop flows for the guest vms due to which vms
cannot ping each other via tunnel.
ovn-nbctl show
switch a4ff74cb-540f-4347
Dear Ben,
thanks for the support!
I receive the error on two servers C & D, below the command outputs:
[root@C ~]# ovs-dpctl show
system@ovs-system:
lookups: hit:283639 missed:348 lost:0
flows: 14
masks: hit:1027059 total:3 hit/pkt:3.62
port 0: ovs-system (internal)
port 1: ovsbr0 (internal)
por
29 matches
Mail list logo
