[Pacemaker] Initial quorum

2011-07-20 Thread pskrap
Hi, I have a cluster where some of the resources cannot run on the same node. All resources must be running to provide a functioning service. This means that a certain amount of nodes needs to be up before it makes sense for the cluster to start any resources. All works fine after enough nodes

Re: [Pacemaker] Cluster with DRBD : split brain

2011-07-20 Thread Hugo Deprez
Hello Andrew, in fact DRBD was in standalone mode but the cluster was working : Here is the syslog of the drbd's split brain : Jul 15 08:45:34 node1 kernel: [1536023.052245] block drbd0: Handshake successful: Agreed network protocol version 91 Jul 15 08:45:34 node1 kernel: [1536023.052267]

Re: [Pacemaker] Cluster with DRBD : split brain

2011-07-20 Thread Digimer
On 07/20/2011 11:24 AM, Hugo Deprez wrote: Hello Andrew, in fact DRBD was in standalone mode but the cluster was working : Here is the syslog of the drbd's split brain : Jul 15 08:45:34 node1 kernel: [1536023.052245] block drbd0: Handshake successful: Agreed network protocol version 91

[Pacemaker] Resource Group Questions - Start/Stop Order

2011-07-20 Thread Bobbie Lind
Hi group, I am running a 6 node system, 4 of which mount the LUNs for my Lustre file system. I currently have 29 LUNs per server set up in 4 Resource Groups. I understand the default startup/shudown order of the resource but I was wondering if there is a way to override that and have all the

Re: [Pacemaker] Fw: Configuration for FS over DRBD over LVM

2011-07-20 Thread Bob Schatz
One correction: I removed the location constraint and simply went with this:       colocation coloc-rule-w-master inf: glance-repos ms_drbd:Master glance-repos-fs-group       order glance-order-fs-after-drbd inf: glance-repos:start ms_drbd:promote glance-repos-fs-group:start       order

Re: [Pacemaker] A question and demand to a resource placement strategy function

2011-07-20 Thread Yuusuke IIDA
Hi, Andrew I confirmed that a problem was revised. Many thanks!! Yuusuke (2011/07/19 10:42), Andrew Beekhof wrote: This should also now be fixed in: http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/devel/rev/960a7e3da680 On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Yuusuke IIDAiiday...@intellilink.co.jp wrote:

Re: [Pacemaker] The placement strategy of the group resource does not work well

2011-07-20 Thread Yuusuke IIDA
Hi, Andrew I confirmed that a problem was revised. Many thanks!! Yuusuke (2011/07/19 10:42), Andrew Beekhof wrote: This should now be fixed in: http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/devel/rev/960a7e3da680 Its based on your patches but is a little more generic. On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at

[Pacemaker] Fw: Configuration for FS over DRBD over LVM

2011-07-20 Thread Bob Schatz
One correction: I removed the location constraint and simply went with this:       colocation coloc-rule-w-master inf: glance-repos ms_drbd:Master glance-repos-fs-group       order glance-order-fs-after-drbd inf: glance-repos:start ms_drbd:promote glance-repos-fs-group:start       order

Re: [Pacemaker] Initial quorum

2011-07-20 Thread Devin Reade
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 09:19:33 AM + pskrap psk...@hotmail.com wrote: I have a cluster where some of the resources cannot run on the same node. All resources must be running to provide a functioning service. This means that a certain amount of nodes needs to be up before it makes

[Pacemaker] Fw: Fw: Configuration for FS over DRBD over LVM

2011-07-20 Thread Bob Schatz
Okay, this configuration works on one node (I am waiting for a hardware problem to be fixed before testing with second node): node cnode-1-3-5 node cnode-1-3-6 primitive glance-drbd ocf:linbit:drbd \         params drbd_resource=glance-repos-drbd \         op start interval=0 timeout=240 \