Hi all,
This announcement is likely to be of interest to people like you who are
concerned about availability.
I founded the Linux-HA project (predecessor to Pacemaker) in 1998 and
led it for nearly 10 years. Back in about November 2010, I announced
the beginnings of what would become the Assimi
Given:
host1# crm node attribute host1 show foo
scope=nodes name=foo value=bar
Why doesn't this return anything:
host1# crm_attribute --node host1 --name foo --query
host1# echo $?
0
cibadmin -Q confirms the presence of the attribute:
This is on pac
Guys,
I can't get rid of following warnings:
Apr 19 19:00:37 node2 crmd: [32230]: WARN: start_subsystem: Client pengine
already running as pid 32240
Apr 19 19:00:44 node2 pengine: [32240]: WARN: unpack_status: Node node1 in
status section no longer exists
Apr 19 19:00:44 node2 pengine: [32240]:
Hi David,
> Why can't both your cluster nodes have 10.20.10.1 as their default
> route all the time?
because the different locations have different networks, routers,
IP-addresses etc. But to be always reachable from the outside, they need
one common IP-address, that is valid on the active node.
On 4/19/13 5:48 AM, T. wrote:
When a server gets active, it will get the cluster-ip "10.20.10.70" and
the default route to "10.20.10.1".
Why can't both your cluster nodes have 10.20.10.1 as their default route
all the time?
Your configuration seems to have way too many moving parts and since
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Alexandr A. Alexandrov
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I do not need CMAN config to be created, since I do not use CMAN...
It's possible, you would have to on RHEL6 system.
> I tried LCMC, it seems to recognize cluster/drbd settings.
> However, when I was finishing looking at
I don't know why redhat doesn't give to the users the alternatives to use
what they want
sorry for my ugly english :-)
Thanks
2013/4/19 T.
> Hi Chris,
>
> > No, you're definitely not missing anything. The 'pcs cluster cib'
> > output isn't pretty.
> why there is an approach to build a new co
Hi,
> Because the nodes are located in different networks, each node needs
> it's own route-ressource, that is only valid if the node is passive and
> will be removed when this node goes active and gets the default route
> for the cluster-ip.
I did not found any solution for this, so I'm going "th
Hi Chris,
> No, you're definitely not missing anything. The 'pcs cluster cib'
> output isn't pretty.
why there is an approach to build a new config-tool at all?
Why not use the crmsh? Why it was dropped in the RHEL-build?
Does it have some relevant disadvantages?
--
To Answer please replace "in
Hi!
I do not need CMAN config to be created, since I do not use
CMAN...
I tried LCMC, it seems to recognize cluster/drbd settings.
However, when I was finishing looking at it, I got corosync dead!
:-(
Apr 19 12:45:30 kennedy corosy
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Alexandr A. Alexandrov
wrote:
> Hi Rasto,
>
> Note that on RHEL 6/CentOS 6, you should run the Pacemaker through CMAN and
> not a Corosync plugin
I wonder if that's still true, but better be safe than sorry.
>
>
> Not glad to hear that... We are using Pacemaker+
Hi Rasto,
Note that on RHEL
6/CentOS 6, you should run the Pacemaker through CMAN and not
a Corosync plugin
Not glad to hear that... We are using Pacemaker+Corosync
everywhere (SuSe, CentOS, OracleLinux servers).
Is there any wa
12 matches
Mail list logo
