I think pacemaker doesn't care about the sbd resource status when it
needs to make a fencing call, that what i think, but i hope some one,
will give me some more information.
Thanks
2014-11-26 15:11 GMT+01:00 Dejan Muhamedagic :
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13:41AM +0100, emmanuel segura wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13:41AM +0100, emmanuel segura wrote:
> But i would like to know if pacemaker needs to start sbd on the node
> where sbd resource isnt running to fence the other nodes, because i
> don't see any start action in the second node:
That's strange. I'd expect that a stonith r
But i would like to know if pacemaker needs to start sbd on the node
where sbd resource isnt running to fence the other nodes, because i
don't see any start action in the second node:
::
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:20:32PM +0100, emmanuel segura wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> The last night, i had a cluster in fencing race using sbd as stonith
Can you give a bit more details.
> device, i would like to know what is the effect to use start-delay in
> my stonith resource in this way:
>
Hi list,
The last night, i had a cluster in fencing race using sbd as stonith
device, i would like to know what is the effect to use start-delay in
my stonith resource in this way:
primitive stonith-sbd stonith:external/sbd \
params sbd_device="/dev/mapper/SBD \
op start interval=
