https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811849
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828809
Bug ID: 828809
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #42 from John D. Ramsdell ---
(In reply to comment #41)
Thank you Michel for your help.
I updated the spec as suggested except the make check target doesn't do real
test so I did not define the %check section.
Spec URL: http://www.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828800
Bug ID: 828800
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828789
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828789
Bug ID: 828789
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828781
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828781
Bug ID: 828781
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827664
--- Comment #9 from Mattia Meneguzzo ---
I wrote to lassekongo83, the author of both Zukini and Zukitwo, about the font
issue:
"[...] Both the GNOME Shell themes use "Ubuntu" font as default.
Since this is not installed or available in the offic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826955
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-chain/apache-commons-chain.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-chain/apache-commons-chain-1.2-2.fc16.src.rpm
- NOTICE.txt file install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828746
Bug ID: 828746
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828735
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828735
Bug ID: 828735
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732
Bug ID: 828732
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
--- Comment #2 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Updated license to GPLv2.
SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/brainfuck.spec
SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/brainfuck-0.1-2.fc16.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
Bug ID: 828720
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828278
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828278
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Vít Ond
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819180
Jaroslav Reznik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739014
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827807
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #18 from Lucas Stach ---
(In reply to comment #17)
I may be a bit off here, but I don't think we need any libc to build libgcc and
I agree that it's not a good idea to add any userspace to this compiler
package.
But I'm only interes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823337
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Ví
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811849
Kushal Das changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Kushal Das
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo