https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841746
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841746
Bug ID: 841746
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823171
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821404
--- Comment #19 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Done https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Steven, please freeze my joining the packager group for three weeks.
I'm going to honeymoon :)
But after that I will continue to work with you.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #32 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachmen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750394
--- Comment #30 from Kapil Arya ---
Hi Orion,
Thanks for the review. Sorry, it took longer to fix things and get back to you
but here I am now :).
Earlier, I didn't upgrade my VMs and that's why you saw those issues. I have
now updated to F17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #11 from Dan Mashal ---
Thanks Rex.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827810
Ben Boeckel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
--- Comment #4 from Fernando Lopez-Lezcano ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > * I really don't like the idea to introduce another SysVinit-script. It
> > won't be easy to switch to systemd later.
Why is that?
> You may
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785446
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
[MUST] "Requires: php-common >= 5.2.0" to satisfy package.xml
[SHOULD] %check is present and all tests pass
[OPTIONAL] For readability, you may want to group your Build* and Requires*
[OPTIONAL] phpci: Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
--- Comment #11 from Dan Mashal ---
cool, thanks, one less blocker to worry about!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831705
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
jj-1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826647
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825750
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #123 from Dan Mashal ---
Thanks Christoph for your comments.
Leigh, I think we almost have a winner here.
I still have some testing to do but I was able to run both 3d and 2d mode
flawlessly.
I was very impressed with how well ever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #122 from Christoph Wickert ---
Some hints purely from looking at the spec and not the srpm:
- Don't use %define, consistently use %global
- Don't use fuzzy patches but rebase them
- Don't use the %{version} in the name of patches be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #121 from leigh scott ---
(In reply to comment #120)
> (In reply to comment #118)
>
> > $ rpmlint cinnamon*
> > cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{_internal_version}
> > cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
> > cinnamo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #120 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to comment #118)
> $ rpmlint cinnamon*
> cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{_internal_version}
> cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
> cinnamon.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{_int
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
--- Comment #10 from raveit65 ---
thx Steve for quick response :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841713
Brian Pepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||841241, 841243
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841241
Brian Pepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||841713
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
Brian Pepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||841713
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841713
Bug ID: 841713
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841001
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter ---
Similar stuff needs work here as with mate-corba and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003#c10 , may be worth taking
the advice in comment #1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
--- Comment #9 from Steve Zesch ---
nyan-cat has been removed and a new version of mate-desktop (1.4.1) has been
uploaded to http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841711
Bug ID: 841711
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter ---
Agreed, let's not go inventing problems that don't exist with the package(s) as
submitted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840050
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823066
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-Validator-2.0.15-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828530
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
python-tw2-d3-0.0.8-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823060
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-Routing-2.0.15-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820452
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823071
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
php-symfony2-Form-2.0.15-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
--- Comment #119 from Dan Mashal ---
To do for me:
Tested Cinnamon after reboot on F17 x86_64, everything seems in good shape,
need to test F18 builds, f17 i686 build and 3D mode on all builds.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832727
Domingo Becker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838423
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
zukiwi-20120709-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zukiwi-20120709-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838423
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252
Dan Mashal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #118 from Dan Ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839405
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember ---
Some issues:
- The licensing situation is unclear. There are some files with GPLv2+ headers
(list.[ch], misc.c), and some without any license headers (wmcore.c,
wmgeneral.[ch]). Can you ask upstream for clar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839405
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
--- Comment #3 from Brendan Jones ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> * I really don't like the idea to introduce another SysVinit-script. It
> won't be easy to switch to systemd later. You may use the following approach
> which is used in libvirt-cli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840239
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember ---
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Kalev Lember - 0.21-2
- Remove bundled which.py and use system python-which instead (#840239)
Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/transmageddon.spec
SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840253
Lukas Zapletal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hdego...@redhat.com
Component|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840239
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember ---
Hello Mario,
Thanks for taking a look. Yes, the project's homepage has been down for about a
week now, I think. Not sure what's up with that.
which.py is a simple command line utility. Within transmageddon,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #8 from Dan Mashal ---
Please,
Use the spec in the first comment to build.
It works.
I don't understand what the confusion is about?
Thanks,
Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #7 from raveit65 ---
I try to find out what calls /usr/lib64/libMateCORBA-2.la
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DMATELOCALEDIR=\""/usr/share/locale\""
-DPNP_IDS=\""/usr/share/hwdata/pnp.ids"\"-pthread -DMATECORBA2=1
-I/usr/include/g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
--- Comment #4 from Fl@sh ---
Tarball uploaded to git. Check it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832471
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-GStreamer-Interfaces-0.06-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-GStreamer-Interfaces-0.06-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832471
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-GStreamer-Interfaces-0.06-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-GStreamer-Interfaces-0.06-2.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832471
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749
--- Comment #23 from Troy Dawson ---
Version bumped. I believe everything else is in place.
Spec URL: http://www.yortnoswad.org/packages/f17/rubygem-sshkey.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.yortnoswad.org/packages/f17/rubygem-sshkey-1.3.1-1.fc17.src.rp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Peeler ---
I added python2-devel. I think the directory is owned since I did:
%{python_sitelib}/heat_jeos*, which I thought would cover both the directory
and its contents.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #6 from Jeff Peeler ---
I added python2-devel in the BuildRequires.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830581
--- Comment #13 from D. Hugh Redelmeier ---
jove(1) talks about invoking JOVE.
jove.man (plain text) and jove.man.ps (postscript) are a complete manual for
JOVE. For example, all commands are described.
jove.qref is a "quick reference guide" f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
Gregor Tätzner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gre...@freenet.de
--- Comment #3 from G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
--- Comment #8 from Nelson Marques ---
The nyan-cat is going to be dropped from MATE soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov ---
* I really don't like the idea to introduce another SysVinit-script. It won't
be easy to switch to systemd later. You may use the following approach which is
used in libvirt-clients
==
[Unit]
D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841662
Bug ID: 841662
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter ---
Probably, but it depends on the particular build failures, on how best to fix
it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839921
Yanko Kaneti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
gnusim8085-1.3.7-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnusim8085-1.3.7-3.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
gnusim8085-1.3.7-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnusim8085-1.3.7-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841335
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
gnusim8085-1.3.7-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnusim8085-1.3.7-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840239
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830581
--- Comment #12 from Paul Wouters ---
correct, rhel5 and fedora up to f12 or so uses md5, After that, it uses sha1.
I renamed doc/README to doc/README.doc because there is also a README file we
include in the root dir of the package, and I canno
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841648
Bug ID: 841648
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #5 from raveit65 ---
Ok, for better understanding.
You mean i've to patch mate-desktop package to build without those *.la files?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785466
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841641
Bug ID: 841641
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785466
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Nick Bebou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839405
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Regarding the old FSF address, I've already contacted the developer.
>
The developer has provided a new tarball at the same place, and I've updated my
files (same download link
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
Those .la files shouldn't be required, if stuff breaks without it, then we can
patch it to add additional (and imo proper) linkage.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785472
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@famillecollet.com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785494
--- Comment #6 from Nick Bebout ---
I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are
fixed with this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785493
--- Comment #4 from Nick Bebout ---
I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are
fixed with this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785450
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@famillecollet.com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785449
--- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout ---
I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are
fixed with this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785447
--- Comment #4 from Nick Bebout ---
I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are
fixed with this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785446
--- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout ---
I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are
fixed with this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785444
--- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout ---
I believe all of the normal blockers for the php-horde-Horde-* packages are
fixed with this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817315
--- Comment #24 from pcpa ---
New package addressing Simone review and updating license tag:
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/megaglest.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/megaglest-3.6.0.3-5.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828370
Wesley Hearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Wesley
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244
--- Comment #6 from pcpa ---
Contacted upstream about name issue
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3545933&group_id=3275&atid=103275
Correction to packaging problems:
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/Singular-surf.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
raveit65 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chat-to...@raveit.de
--- Comment #7 from rave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244
--- Comment #5 from pcpa ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think that you can't assume that only Singular uses the application, since
> it looks like a rather general use application (it has a GUI after all).
Yes. I did "choose" it because it a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #3 from raveit65 ---
and add those lines to files.
%{_libdir}/libMateCORBA-2.la
%{_libdir}/libMateCORBA-imodule-2.la
%{_libdir}/libMateCORBACosNaming-2.la
%{_libdir}/matecorba-2.0/Everything_module.la
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #2 from raveit65 ---
Opps,
removing *.la files is a bad idea because for building mate-desktop we need
them.
remove those lines:
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/matecorba-2.0/*.*a
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244
--- Comment #4 from pcpa ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> %{?_dist} is wrong, it should read %{?dist}.
>
> **
Thanks. I messed something when finishing the package and uploading,
as I had it correct in my computer:
$ rpm -q Singular-surf
Singu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-Object-0.859-5.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835049
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola ---
... or as instructed by Bill in comment #2, join the Fedora maintainers and
submit your package for review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835049
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552
Ismael Olea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
--- Comment #2 from Fl@sh ---
New:
Spec:
https://raw.github.com/F1ash/plasmaMailChecker/simple/kde-plasma-mail-checker.spec
SRPM:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4790/4264790/kde-plasma-mail-checker-1.7.31-1.fc17.src.rpm
In Commen
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
