https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842124
--- Comment #9 from Xiao-Long Chen ---
You're right. That is the current source for the GNOME:Ayatana. Damian (if he
will maintain the package) should copy the spec file to somewhere else and
remove that part of the spec.
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842124
--- Comment #8 from Michael Scherer ---
so if appmenu-qt package work without patchs, why is there the need for
libXfixes-ubuntu-devel, and if there is no need for it, why do you keep it in
the fedora sources ?
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #28 from raveit65 ---
before i go to bed
BuildRequires: autoconf automake
you can remove, mock builds without it
BuildRequires: libtool you can remove if mate-common-1.4.0-6 is in stable
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #27 from Dan Mashal ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4327253
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #26 from Dan Mashal ---
4. MUST omit static libraries and libtool archives, ie, items that match
%{_libdir}/lib*.a
%{_libdir}/lib*.la
(or provide justification why they warrant an exception)
DONE
5. SHOULD own includedir subdirecto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #25 from Dan Mashal ---
DONE.
Please check it.
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-corba.spec
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-corba-1.4.0-8.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter ---
OK, now that the %files list is clearer,
4. MUST omit static libraries and libtool archives, ie, items that match
%{_libdir}/lib*.a
%{_libdir}/lib*.la
(or provide justification why they warrant an exception)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
Jeff Peeler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #20 from Jeff Peel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #23 from Dan Mashal ---
f18:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4327216
f17:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4327220
f16:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4327223
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #22 from Dan Mashal ---
1. MUST: create -devel pkg to own development files, similar to comment #1 's
version, including the hack to avoid the multilib conflicts
DONE.
2. MUST: missing scriptlets for shared libraries.
DONE.
3. MU
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842124
--- Comment #7 from Xiao-Long Chen ---
Just in case it's not clear from my previous comment, appmenu-qt will work
*without* any patches to other packages :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842124
--- Comment #6 from Xiao-Long Chen ---
Sure. Somewhere along the chain of build dependencies, qt-ubuntu needs
libXfixes-devel. The conflict comes from us providing a libXfixes-ubuntu-devel
package (for Unity), which provides and obsoletes libXfix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #43 from raveit65 ---
yeap, it works.
no need to to add BuildRequires: libtool for libmatekeyring
I will leave positiv karma.
thx Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What's the recommended way to conditionally apply a patch based on release
> version?
Nevermind, just having the patch in the fedora branch is the obvious answer to
this. It builds w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
truezip-7.5.5-6.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/truezip-7.5.5-6.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #42 from Dan Mashal ---
Done.
Please test and leave karma.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-common-1.4.0-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-common-1.4.0-6.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-common-1.4.0-6.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-common-1.4.0-6.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741129
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
Flags|fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838608
Eric Christensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@christensenplace.us
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842066
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747765
Eric Christensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|e...@christensenplace.us|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810010
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
genders-1.18-6.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810010
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #86 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842006
--- Comment #1 from Adam Miller ---
I would like to add FAS account name tdawson to this review as I'll be out of
town for the next week and don't want to be a blocker.
Fedora Account System Username: maxamillion tdawson
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841641
--- Comment #2 from Adam Miller ---
I would like to add FAS account name tdawson to this review as I'll be out of
town for the next week and don't want to be a blocker.
Fedora Account System Username: maxamillion tdawson
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842379
--- Comment #2 from Adam Miller ---
I would like to add FAS account name tdawson to this review as I'll be out of
town for the next week and don't want to be a blocker.
Fedora Account System Username: maxamillion tdawson
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
--- Comment #6 from Troy Dawson ---
ruby and ruby-devel, and rubygems and rubygems-devel. I just like to be
complete. But to be honest, I'm not sure it needs the ruby and ruby-devel.
Those were required to get the original ruby_sitelib directo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #39 from raveit65 ---
I give you a example:
building libmatekeyring with fedora's mate-common
DEBUG: + cd libmatekeyring-1.4.0
DEBUG: + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
DEBUG: + NOCONFIGURE=1
DEBUG: + ./autogen.sh
DEBUG: /usr/bin/m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #38 from Dan Mashal ---
Sure.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #85 from Dan Mashal ---
Thanks Wolfgang.
mate-common is there on purpose until we get a group setup.
MATE-Desktop has been proposed as an official feature for Fedora 18 so yeah I
require mate-common right now on purpose.
Thanks f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #37 from raveit65 ---
Can you update the requires like in my comment 35 and release an update?
Otherwise you have to add the missing Requires to every other package which
need them.
The sense of mate-common is this not to do for every
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer ---
Nitpicking a little, but i think BuildRequires could be simplied ( ruby-devel
pull ruby, rubygems-devel pull rubygems )
Why does it require selinux policy and policycoreutils-python ? ( nothing in
the curr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841641
--- Comment #1 from Troy Dawson ---
Informal Review:
The spec file needs to match the rpm name.
Please rename gearchanger-mcollective-plugin.spec to
rubygems-gearchanger-mcollective-plugin.spec
Although you have these variables defined for older
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
truezip-7.5.5-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/truezip-7.5.5-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842890
--- Comment #1 from Troy Dawson ---
I have updated the package fixing two issues.
1 - I have changed %{ruby_sitelibdir} to be %{ruby_vendorlibdir} which cleaned
up having files in /usr/local/
2 - I have also added LICENSE to %DOC
Spec URL:
http:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
--- Comment #4 from Troy Dawson ---
Fixed: I have changed %{ruby_sitelibdir} to be %{ruby_vendorlibdir} which
cleaned up having files in /usr/local/
I have also added LICENSE to the %DOC.
Spec URL:
http://www.yortnoswad.org/packages/review/rubyg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842013
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer ---
Build in mock fail :
Exécution_de(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E1njxS
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd nfsometer-1.1
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py bui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
--- Comment #3 from Troy Dawson ---
Aha ... I just found where it talks about this in the documentation.
"Previously, %{ruby_sitelibdir} and %{ruby_sitearchdir} were used. However, as
they are meant only for local installations, please use %{rub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842124
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer ---
In fact, I do not understand, can you explain in more detail what are such
conflict, what do you see, how it fail the build ?
I see no reason that fedora on OBS should be different from koji or mock,
that'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
--- Comment #2 from Troy Dawson ---
Hmm ... then I'm going to have a couple other packages with the same problem.
The problem is that I replaced the variable %{ruby_sitelib} with
%{ruby_sitelibdir}
So the old way ruby_sitelib was determined with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #2 from Jef Spaleta ---
okay I'll cycle back and do a mock build or two and get the deps in order.
-jef
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842124
--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer ---
Now, the srpm is missing ( 404 ).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #1 from Mich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #1 from Mich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741129
Matthieu Saulnier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Mat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||839395, 840037
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840037
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||842891
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839395
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||842891
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841641
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839064
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||841641
--
You are receiving this mail bec
ime-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
avgtime.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary avgtime
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %Y
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %m
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %d
avgtime.src: W: invalid-url Source0: avgtime-20120724.tar.gz
3 packages and 0 specfi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||842459
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839064
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||842459
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842459
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||842891, 839064
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839064
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||842890
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||842890
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842890
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||842891, 839064
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
Bug ID: 842891
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842890
Bug ID: 842890
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
--- Comment #6 from Steven Dake ---
Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR - Jeff has been sponsored in a different review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840636
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|0x |Package Review
Blocks|177841 (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Steven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #18 from Steven Dake ---
PASS Must: Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an
egg from upstream into the proper directory. (See prebuilt binaries Guidelines
for details)
PASS Must: Python eggs must not download
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822997
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-eper-0.60-2.20120621git16bae32.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842124
Xiao-Long Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chillermillerlong@hotmail.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #84 from leigh scott ---
(In reply to comment #83)
>
> Little Note:
> IHMO Requires:mate-common is unnecessary, because we need mate-common
> only
> for building the package as BuildRequires.
> But it isn't bad, only unnece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794923
--- Comment #6 from Garrett Holmstrom ---
I did a successful test build that removed the bundled jars in %prep. If you
run the test suite then it might be worth removing them anyway just in case;
given that junit is there I suspect that they're
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794923
Garrett Holmstrom changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842066
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
sidc-1.8-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sidc-1.8-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842066
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #83 from raveit65 ---
[rave@mother Mate]$ sudo yum localinstall
mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc16.noarch.rpm
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, downloadonly, fastestmirror,
presto, remove-with-leaves, show-leaves, versionlo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #17 from Jeff Peeler ---
Requested changes made.
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/heat-api/heat-rpms/master/heat.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpeeler/heat-4-5.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #82 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #81 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-doc-utils-1.4.0-13.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707
--- Comment #80 from Michael Scherer ---
The policy exist for a reason, in this case, adding version on Obsoletes permit
to avoid potential problem in the future. For example, if there need to have a
rpm named mate-doc-utils-stylesheets, the usag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830581
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #16 from Steven Dake ---
Regarding this rpmlint error:
[root@bigiron results]# rpmlint heat*noarch.rpm
heat.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
I believe rpmli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #15 from Steven Dake ---
Jeff,
There are several blocking issues:
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
for EPEL5. Otherwise not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #14 from Steven Dake ---
Package review:
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
truezip-7.5.5-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/truezip-7.5.5-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836850
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
--- Comment #13 from Jeff Peeler ---
Removed pycrypto
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/heat-api/heat-rpms/master/heat.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpeeler/heat-4-4.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
Tomas Radej changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Tomas R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
rpmlint says:
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %Y
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %m
avgtime.src:16: W: macro-in-comment %d
avgtime.src: W: invalid-url Source0: avgtime-20120724.tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
Tomas Radej changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Koji scratch build against F17:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4325855
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Bug ID: 842778
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
