Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903768
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903768
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 707765
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=707765action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903768
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857724
--- Comment #18 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
As this package is approved for a long time, can you please push it ASAP in
EPEL-5 to fix workpress broken deps ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919689
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu ---
Fixed rpmlint warnings:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-jshashes.spec
SRPM URL:
http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-jshashes-1.0.1-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903785
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
LICENSE is Apache 2.0: OK.
doc/LICENSE is BY-NC-ND (http://jmsyst.com/libs/parser-lib), this only apply to
documentation (not provided in the rpm, but present in the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903768
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #25 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
Hello?
I would like to package this package for fedora?!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736861
--- Comment #10 from Mads Kiilerich m...@kiilerich.com ---
Spec URL: http://kiilerix.fedorapeople.org/hgview.spec
SRPM URL: http://kiilerix.fedorapeople.org/hgview-1.7.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919851
Bug ID: 919851
Summary: Review Request: ghc-IfElse - Anaphoric and
miscellaneous useful control-flow
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919851
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5102324
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919851
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912102
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912090
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917412
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919689
--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Great.
I assume this needs an exception? Like a few other of the node packages going
through review, it appears to be another case of forked/adapted code rather
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919689
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu ---
I've opened https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/263 to request an exception.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919867
Bug ID: 919867
Summary: Review Request: billiards - A free cue sports
simulator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911188
--- Comment #7 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Exception ticket opened:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/264
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911229
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
lib/assert/error.js - adapted from mocha
lib/assert/utils.js - taken from node/lib/assert.js
lib/utils/wildcard.js - looks like it may have come from somewhere?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917412
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- License field in
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917412
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917412
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910129
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910131
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910136
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910129
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911053
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910129
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Allow to install with APC = 3.1.15 (for user data cache only):
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/dba68c07178433dd5c88b7f211deffeb1cbf07a0
Spec:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911053
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Thanks again Tom. You're reviewing these so fast I actually have a backlog :)
Tests seems to fail in mock but pass when run outside it?
That's odd. What errors
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914988
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916405
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911053
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910131
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Remove zero-byte History.md.
Spec URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-buddycloud-http-api/nodejs-jwt-simple.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911053
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910131
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919590
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919591
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919590
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916672
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Missing BRs:
perl(base) from lib/Any/URI/Escape.pm:14
perl(Exporter) from lib/Any/URI/Escape.pm:14
Done.
Again, line 33 could be safely
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919591
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Yeah, so I guess I really need to wait until the ipmitool bug is fixed here. ;(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910528
Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919590
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919592
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919591
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910136
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
- Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception
The deps directory should be removed in %setup and the package patched
to link against the system
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910136
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910136
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917330
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910148
--- Comment #6 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Spec URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-buddycloud-http-api/nodejs-connect.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919645
Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914924
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|919689 |
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919689
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|914924 |
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919689
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910148
--- Comment #7 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu ---
Great. The only thing I'm wondering about now is whether the symlinking to
%{_datadir} is acceptable - the guidelines say that the module should be
patched to cope with that.
It
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917330
--- Comment #3 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable[?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910148
--- Comment #8 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
A while ago I asked T.C. Hollingsworth (who I assume has been involved in the
drafting of those guidelines) about this via private email:
T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914924
--- Comment #9 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Awesome!
Issues:
===
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
0.9.10 released just a few days ago. This is the only issue though, and all
tests pass with both 0.9.8
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910148
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914924
--- Comment #10 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu ---
Updated to 0.9.10:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth-0.9.10-1.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914924
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910793
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914924
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910148
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919339
Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919460
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265
--- Comment #7 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org ---
Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/opentrep/opentrep.spec
SRPM URL:
http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/opentrep/opentrep-0.5.3-1.fc18.src.rpm
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919924
Bug ID: 919924
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-supertest - Super-agent driven
library for testing HTTP servers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910150
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919924
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919924
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|910150
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910150
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|919924
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919924
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919929
Bug ID: 919929
Summary: Review Request: python-catbox - Sandbox implementation
originally designed for Pisi
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919932
Bug ID: 919932
Summary: Review Request: python-ctypesgen - A pure-python
ctypes wrapper generator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
Bug ID: 919933
Summary: Review Request: python-py2neo - short summary here
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919339
Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919645
Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919937
Bug ID: 919937
Summary: Review Request: python-testify - A replacement for
Python's unittest module and nose
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917740
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Please eol/retire/block mysql now,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917330
--- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Package Review
...
[x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable[?] = Not evaluated
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
See:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917329
Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917328
Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919948
Bug ID: 919948
Summary: Review Request: java-1.8.0-openjdk - OpenJDK 8
provides a Java runtime, library and development tools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919339
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Thanks Michael for reviewing.
- The -devel package has multiple dependencies on ghc-compiler (may be
perfectly expected acceptable, esp. since other Haskell -devel
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919339
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919339
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917365
--- Comment #1 from Truong Anh Tuan tua...@iwayvietnam.com ---
While waiting for package review started, upstream developers fix some
important patches.
I update the package for review here:
Spec URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913296
Clint Savage her...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919948
--- Comment #1 from Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5104539
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
93 matches
Mail list logo