https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002828
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016809
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016809
--- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #12)
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
Since Rodent and the required package librfm depend by dbh = 5.0, I'll do a
SCM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682
Palle Ravn ravn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gimp-elsamuko-24-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-elsamuko-24-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gimp-elsamuko-24-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-elsamuko-24-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065
q2dg q...@yahoo.es changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||q...@yahoo.es
--- Comment #30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046813
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047532
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960851
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|notready|
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
Bug ID: 1048299
Summary: Review Request: fmpp - FreeMarker based preprocessor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010003 (bigdata-review)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
datanucleus-api-jdo-3.2.6-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datanucleus-api-jdo-3.2.6-3.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
Steve Linabery slina...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Please change
BuildRequires: mvn(bsh:bsh)
Requires: mvn(bsh:bsh)
with
BuildRequires: mvn(org.beanshell:bsh)
Requires: mvn(org.beanshell:bsh)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Please remove Class-Path frpm manifest
attribute name=Class-Path value=/usr/share/java/oro.jar
/usr/share/java/freemarker.jar /usr/share/java/bsh.jar
/usr/share/java/xml-resolver.jar /
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-state-machine-2.0.7-1.el6
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
javac target and souce *must* be set at least to 1.5
and source to UTF-8
javac
bootclasspath=${bootclasspath.path}
srcdir=src/java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045756
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vdr-live-0.3.0-7.69f84f9.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vdr-live-0.3.0-7.69f84f9.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
Requires:jpackage-utils
must be replaced by
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
Requires:jpackage-utils
rm -rf %{buildroot}is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Sorry
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
Requires:jpackage-utils
must be replaced by
BuildRequires: javapackage-tools
Requires:javapackage-tools
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028743
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #8 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com ---
thanks, I will do your review as soon I get home tonight.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010613
Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmarr...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010613
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Sorry
fmpp_0.9.14/lib/forbuild/classes/imageinfo/ImageInfo.java
should be consider as bundled libraries
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
--- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de ---
Okay, changing the URL in the *.spec to something macro-free is not an issue.
Are you interested in taking the review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Please fetch the latest snapshot from git.
Also it has a tag 0.1.0, so your version should be 0.1.0.git(DATE).(COMMIT) or
something else:
[rpmaker@fab ~]$ rpmdev-vercmp
Epoch1: 0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
BTW, if a locale is not supported by Fedora filesystem, should we report it
as a bug?
Yes, indeed... I was only looking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1047021 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Please use sed to do the hack, no need to use dos2unix(may also change the
timestamp).
Remove old packaging lines.
Then I will run a full review.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
In this case since we have an upstream version number, the %{release} tag
should be 1%{dist}.
Also, since upstream doesn't maintain tarballs, it's perhaps preferable to
include in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|susi.leht...@iki.fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037443
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037443
--- Comment #8 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #4)
Well, after Lubomir's ping you should/could have waited a bit more, at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887821
Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@kupo.se
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046121
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
- Conditional %{?dist}
- Removed sub-packages -- This does make more sense and is easier this way... I
don't know why I originally sub-packaged
- Skip all tests requiring a server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046122
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
- Conditional %{?dist}
- Added conflict w/ PEAR-based DoctrineCommon pkg (version 2.4)
Diff:
https://github.com/siwinski/rpms/commit/4b409335ed63ff82a36a2dd6b9b4c6e2554e464b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887821
--- Comment #3 from Trond H. Amundsen t.h.amund...@usit.uio.no ---
(In reply to Johan Swensson from comment #2)
Wow, this was an old one. :)
Yeah, I'd almost forgotten it :)
If you're still interested I can review this.
Yes, I'm still
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046125
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
- Conditional %{?dist}
- Added conflict w/ PEAR-based DoctrineCommon pkg (version 2.4)
Diff:
https://github.com/siwinski/rpms/commit/77ae1377a204278a60818da848ebdf230d3c180a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016809
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016809
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #3 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
The version number here is probably more like a snapshot release timestamp.
In that case the timestamp is probably better off in %{release} as per this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046124
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037443
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037443
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887821
Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|k...@kupo.se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046123
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046123
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046123
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046124
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046124
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048045
--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
How about just doing
%global __python2 %{__python}
an possibly wrapping that in a conditional block when python 3 becomes default
(F21 or F22 I guess)?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011960
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
datanucleus-rdbms-3.2.9-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datanucleus-rdbms-3.2.9-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011960
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662
--- Comment #72 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: docker-io
Branches: el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662
Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662
--- Comment #73 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Misformatted request, and no epel7 branches are being created yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jupp-26-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jupp-26-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jupp-26-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jupp-26-1.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jupp-26-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jupp-26-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jupp-26-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jupp-26-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
modem-manager-gui-0.0.16-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/modem-manager-gui-0.0.16-4.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046688
--- Comment #7 from David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6)
David, will netsurf* be available for f20?
I do not plan to make any of the packages available for F-20. Note that I am
not packaging the
101 - 200 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
