https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079589
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
piglit-1-0.14.20140414GIT8775223.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/piglit-1-0.14.20140414GIT8775223.fc20
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034413
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090802
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089710
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894594
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069451
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609
Bug 894609 depends on bug 894594, which changed state.
Bug 894594 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Bcp - Branch-Cut-Price Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894594
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034413
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|SDL2_ttf-2.0.12-2.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089710
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-gensim-0.9.1-1.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894599
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082193
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089178
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
baurthefi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||baurthefi...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
--- Comment #15 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #14)
(In reply to marcindulak from comment #13)
From my perspective i would prefer to keep also the old changelog, for the
purpose of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
--- Comment #16 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
(In reply to marcindulak from comment #15)
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #14)
IIRC the Fedora policy is that if you import from another public repository
for Fedora, you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091755
David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #17 from baurthefi...@gmail.com ---
1. Builds on copr fail sometime due to failing test in file arpack.jl
2. After installing from copr, I got the following error message:
Target architecture mismatch. Please delete or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
--- Comment #17 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #16)
(In reply to marcindulak from comment #15)
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #14)
IIRC the Fedora policy is that if you import
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
--- Comment #3 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
add %doc Gpl.txt to javadoc sub package
Done
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923960
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812
--- Comment #15 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812
--- Comment #16 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
The MPI stuff is OK as well.
I'd ask you to be a little bit more verbose in %files, since free usage of
wildcards can have devastating results. I suggest
%files
%{_bindir}/%{name}*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419
--- Comment #3 from Alberto Chiusole bebo.s...@gmail.com ---
Do you mean the magic packet required by WOL?
Here there are the requirements:
http://www.muflone.com/gwakeonlan/english/wol_requirements.html
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419
--- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
The build fails due to the xdg module missing.
You can remove -n %{name}-%{version}, because that's the default.
The changelog must hold your real name. You may obfuscate your e-mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
No, http was missing in your URLs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070702
Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.el6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070702
--- Comment #6 from Howard Chu h...@symas.com ---
Right. The main significance is to prevent it getting confused with mdbtools,
which is used to manipulate Microsoft Access DB files.
As for the test suite - it's really only there for my use,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419
--- Comment #6 from Alberto Chiusole bebo.s...@gmail.com ---
Ok, thanks for your tips.
I'll work on it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jortho-1.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jortho-1.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
--- Comment #5 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com ---
I just wanted to raise the issue of the bing image in the source. In my
previous review request I took care of that by removing the image and the code
needing it.
I also contacted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jortho-1.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jortho-1.0-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
--- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
Actually, I based the tarball generation script on yours, so there shouldn't be
any references to Bing in the SRPM. Thank you for your work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
--- Comment #7 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com ---
Ok, great! Thanks again!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299
Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #18 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr ---
Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4, but
I don't know how to make it automatic, and more profoundly there's no guarantee
that Julia will work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406
Bug ID: 1093406
Summary: Review Request: python-junitxml - pyunit extension to
output JUnit compatible XML
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093407
Bug ID: 1093407
Summary: Review Request: vdr-epg-daemon - A client plugin which
provides scraped metadata from EPGD
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #19 from baurthefi...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #18)
Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4,
but I don't know how to make it automatic, and more profoundly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093408
Bug ID: 1093408
Summary: Review Request: vdr-scraper2vdr - A client plugin
which provides scraped metadata from EPGD
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #20 from baurthefi...@gmail.com ---
I meant, when you compile julia on a newer CPU, its library file
/usr/lib64/julia/sys.so may not work on older CPUs.
See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/julia-dev/Eqp0GhZWxME
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410
Bug ID: 1093410
Summary: Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG
data into the Video Disc Recorder
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406
--- Comment #1 from Steve Linabery slina...@redhat.com ---
scratch build passes:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6803933
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406
--- Comment #2 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com ---
Please use the LGPLv3 licence tag
Please add COPYING file (LGPL3) to %doc
Please remove the Copyright section from the description
Please consider adding a python3 version of the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149
--- Comment #6 from Ben Nemec bne...@redhat.com ---
Okay, I've updated the spec and srpm:
http://fedorapeople.org/~bnemec/dib-utils-0.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
http://fedorapeople.org/~bnemec/dib-utils.spec
I believe that should address the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149
--- Comment #7 from Ben Nemec bne...@redhat.com ---
For anyone interested in testing the split package, the
diskimage-builder-0.1.15 build is available here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6804123
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074129
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Compress-LZF-3.7-1.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066029
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|csmock-1.0.7-1.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.el6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
--- Comment #19 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
Ping! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410
--- Comment #1 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg2vdr.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-epg2vdr-0.1.0-2.20130322git324f392.fc20.src.rpm
don't know
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #18)
Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4,
but I don't know how to make it automatic, and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410
--- Comment #2 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg2vdr.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-epg2vdr-0.1.0-3.20130322git324f392.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093408
--- Comment #1 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-scraper2vdr.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-scraper2vdr-0.1.1-4.20140428git30008b3.fc20.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901
--- Comment #10 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr ---
Actually, after fixing openspecfun to build with system openlibm, I realized we
can indeed build it without openlibm at all, and only set USE_OPENLIBM=1 when
building Julia: since
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #22 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
(In reply to baurthefirst from comment #19)
Have you considered setting JULIA_CPU_TARGET to core2? By default it is set
to native, thus causing the issue as I wrote earlier:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500
Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1062901 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901
Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1089500 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
--- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
I'm about to head out on vacation, but can do the review when I get back.
I'm perfectly happy for anyone else to review sooner if they like.
Ping me again late next week?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
--- Comment #21 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
Hey Kevin, Absolutely no problems either ways.
I am in no hurry. I just remembered about this package when I used the clustal
yesterday - that's all! :)
If some takes it up for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901
Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #23 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr ---
baurthefirst: Right, I'll fix that too.
Orion: Thanks for the LLVM hint. I just have to hope that the situation where
Julia does not support a new version of LLVM which is pushed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500
Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1062901
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901
Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1089500
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jmapviewer.spec
SRPM URL: http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jmapviewer-1.03-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #24 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr ---
Orion: How do you reproduce the ENETUNREACH tests failure? Do you need to
disable the loopback interface?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #25 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
linux-user-chroot --unshare-net / rpmbuild
copr builds should reproduce as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058198
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
