https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
A bunch of missing buildtime deps:
- Config, inc/Module/Install/Can.pm:5, inc/Module/Install/XSUtil.pm:13
- constant, inc/Module/Install/XSUtil.pm:18
- ExtUtils::MM_Unix,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018
--- Comment #7 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl ---
New Spec file and SRPM location:
Spec URL: http://www.bacula.pl/baculum.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.bacula.pl/baculum-7.0.6-0.1.a.fc21.src.rpm
I fixed pointed things to change:
1) I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
Actually, the way I added the conditionals is broken, so for now we'll go with
this:
SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.21-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199189
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204777
--- Comment #2 from Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com ---
BuildArch: noarch is missing otherwise looks good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204777
--- Comment #3 from Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com ---
Updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204777
Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248
Bug ID: 1205248
Summary: Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to
JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Niemantsverdriet andrewniema...@gmail.com ---
Uploaded updated SRPM built against the new version of librsync that was
released to the repos recently.
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205192
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1205121
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Bug ID: 1205194
Summary: Review Request: mingw-libepoxy - MinGW Windows
libepoxy library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec
SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.21-2.fc20.src.rpm
* Mon Mar 23 2015 Jonathan G. Underwood
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204777
Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.1-4.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.1-4.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.1-4.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.1-4.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201325
--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Hi Chandan,
Thanks for the updated package and sorry for confusing you about using
sphinx-build in %install. I asked on packaging list and got the confirmation
that it should be used
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204172
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910798
--- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
I did not uploaded the package actually. Now it should be correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.1-4.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.1-4.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1181081, 652183
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205121
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1205192
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205192
Bug ID: 1205192
Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-OpenID-Consumer - Library for
consumers of OpenID identities
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204009
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204009
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199189
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199189
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
Ok, all checked in and built. Thanks very much for the review Marek.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
Bug 1198312 depends on bug 1199189, which changed state.
Bug 1199189 Summary: Review Request: js-web-socket-js - HTML5 Web Socket
implementation powered by Flash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199189
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199189
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204777
Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202604
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205121
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910798
--- Comment #9 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Um, the License tag still states `FIXME: Waiting on legal department'.
Packaging looks good to me. Just update the License tag to TTWL and perhaps
remove the extra empty line at the end
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
Updated. Links are same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205121
Bug ID: 1205121
Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-OpenID-Common - Libraries
shared between Net::OpenID::Consumer and
Net::OpenID::Server
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204172
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201325
--- Comment #4 from Chandan Kumar chkumar...@gmail.com ---
Hi Parag,
I have again updated the
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-oslo-context.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476
--- Comment #9 from James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Piotr Popieluch from comment #8)
There is a policy on stalled review requests:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
Thanks for the link
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201325
--- Comment #3 from Chandan Kumar chkumar...@gmail.com ---
Hello Parag,
Thanks for the review.
Here is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-oslo-context.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202303
Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205121
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1204812
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1205121
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910798
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693
--- Comment #17 from Paul Colby red...@colby.id.au ---
The -examples package now needs an explicit dependency on pcp
Done :)
The explicit dependency on pcp-libs-devel would be safer ... if it were
arch-specific
Done :) I see now that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202303
Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177805
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177805
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.el7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
--- Comment #30 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
All blocking issues have been addressed!
TODO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Packages have proper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177805
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the quick review, Erik!
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mingw-libepoxy
Short Description: MinGW Windows libepoxy library
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057909
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols/mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057910
--- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtserialport/mingw-qt5-qtserialport.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205459
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||858058
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205457
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||858058
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858058
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1205458
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205458
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||858058
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858058
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1205457
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
coin-or-Dip-0.91.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/coin-or-Dip-0.91.2-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203105
--- Comment #8 from Graeme Gillies ggill...@redhat.com ---
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the package and specfile with all the
requested changes.
http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org//rubygem-amq-protocol.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205458
Bug ID: 1205458
Summary: Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 for
Windows - QtWebChannel component
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858058
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1205459
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203105
--- Comment #10 from Graeme Gillies ggill...@redhat.com ---
Ah thanks.
I've fixed that now and re-uploaded the spec and srpm (didn't bump release for
such a trivial change)
http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org//rubygem-amq-protocol.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #2)
(In reply to Erik van Pienbroek from comment #1)
* Please use a versioned BR: mingw{32,64}-filesystem (for example = 95)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501
--- Comment #12 from Ben Rosser rosser@gmail.com ---
Based on some additional experimental evidence, it seems the tests assume that
/dev is mounted. I'll work with upstream on getting them to fail gracefully
rather than outright segfault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203105
--- Comment #9 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
macro-in-changelog alert... :)
* Wed Mar 25 2015 Graeme Gillies ggill...@redhat.com - 1.9.2-2
- Cleaned up spec file as per feedback from review (%license,
remove extra gemspec,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203105
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
ISSUES:
- Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
pulled in by maven-local
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858063
--- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtconnectivity/mingw-qt5-qtconnectivity.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858062
--- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtactiveqt/mingw-qt5-qtactiveqt.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205457
Bug ID: 1205457
Summary: Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtenginio - Qt5 for Windows
- QtEnginio component
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177805
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203067
Graeme Gillies ggill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205459
Bug ID: 1205459
Summary: Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 for
Windows - QtWebSockets component
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177805
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202604
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204172
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910798
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-docopt-docopt-go-0-0.1.git.854c423.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-docopt-docopt-go-0-0.1.git.854c423.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Crypt-DH-GMP-0.00012-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-DH-GMP-0.00012-1.fc22
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202890
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo