https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
--- Comment #10 from Tom Hughes ---
License added:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/libosmium.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/libosmium-2.2.0-5.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984
Jan ONDREJ changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #22 from Jan ONDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244014
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #2)
> Provides: python2-%{srcname} is nonstandard, I have never seen any python 2
> packages provide python2-* name.
Oh, it's new in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201176
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244014
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #17 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #16)
> (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #15)
> > I have no concern over adding more text in the spec file but its place at
> > top of t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #16 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #15)
> I have no concern over adding more text in the spec file but its place at
> top of the spec file.
OK, got it. I'll rearrange the text and update eve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #15 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
In Fedora rpm packaging, I will suggest whenever something extra you need to
add in spec file, good to add it just before the start of that relevant
section/line.
I have no concern over adding more text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #14 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
I have already pushed updates with the license comment like this for more than
half of the gdouros fonts, what should I do?
For the time being, given how Mr Douros' page has been altered, I think
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #27 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
oops please discard above comment it should be for other bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #26 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
I don't think it is really mandatory to add license text in the spec file as
the text given in the upstream website already matches with the definition of
Public Domain license given on
https://fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231458
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235422
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207280
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-semantic_version-2.4 |python-semantic_version-2.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242663
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #22 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241419
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233167
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-monotonic-0.1-1.fc22 |python-monotonic-0.1-1.fc21
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155829
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|openvas-gsa-6.0.3-4.fc21|openvas-gsa-6.0.3-4.fc22
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241944
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219905
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-cliff-tablib-1.1-1.f |python-cliff-tablib-1.1-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235305
Jeff Backus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233167
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233168
Bug 1233168 depends on bug 1233167, which changed state.
Bug 1233167 Summary: Review Request: python-monotonic - An implementation of
time.monotonic() for Python 2 & < 3.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233167
What|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241838
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207280
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236328
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219905
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-cliff-tablib-1.1-1.e |python-cliff-tablib-1.1-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
--- Comment #9 from Jeff Backus ---
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update. Package looks fine except the doc subpackage needs a
copy of the license. Please add that and I'll approve. Thanks!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241423
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353
Bug ID: 1244353
Summary: Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244352
Bug ID: 1244352
Summary: add openjpeg2000 driver for gdal
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: rashad.kan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241423
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr1...@gmail.com
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Alexander Ploumistos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
Alexander Ploumistos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
Alexander Ploumistos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #12 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244315
Bug ID: 1244315
Summary: Review Request: rpmdistro-gitoverlay - Manage an
overlay repository of RPMs from upstream git
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10)
> Hm, one more thing: why not just build use a single source package for
> Alexander/Anaktoria/Aroania/Asea ?
Mainly because of this:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151839
--- Comment #6 from Pranav Kant ---
| Major events
|
| September 2014 - Snowball site and software no longer being
| actively maintained
| The code has all been loaded into Github, and we may still
| make very occasional changes.
I noticed t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Hm, one more thing: why not just build use a single source package for
Alexander/Anaktoria/Aroania/Asea ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7)
> > > %description seems to contain a private use unicode character (1480
> > > 1561).
> >
> > Thanks, there was a funny-looking zero, I f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119986
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148331
Bug 1148331 depends on bug 1148329, which changed state.
Bug 1148329 Summary: EPEL-7 branch: gmrun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148329
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148329
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
New spec file and source rpm.
Spec URL:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-asea-fonts/gdouros-asea-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #10 from Michael Hampton ---
Spec URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2449/docker-compose.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2449/docker-compose-1.2.0-3.fc24.src.rpm
Scratch builds:
F24: https://koji.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Fixed the links above and added license text and appstream validation check to
the spec file.
Spec URL:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-aroania-fonts/gdouros-aroania-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I don't think this makes sense to make this into a package. We are moving to
dnf, so new dependencies on yum should not be added. dnf deals with chroot
installation just fine, without any fu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #9 from Michael Hampton ---
Oh yes I'm still interested. I will create new scratch builds shortly as it
seems the ones above are no longer in koji.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383
--- Comment #9 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Mmm I thought in SPEC.
Using --nogpg due to errors in GPG checks when building chrootdir for another
Fedora version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #8 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Michael, hope you're still interested in getting this in, if it helps makes
things easier, just 1 scratch build for the latest stable or rawhide should be
fine for package reviews.
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #7 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Hi Marek, can we please get this one moving?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Petr Ša
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
--- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata ---
Thanks.
This is still fairly simple. You should see some other perl packages ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243499
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
Bug ID: 1244196
Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtwebengine - Qt5 - QtWebEngine
components
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: mediu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242663
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Hash-Layout-1.02-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-Layout-1.02-2.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242663
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243782
--- Comment #3 from Parag ---
Upstream release 1.0.2 version but forgot to tag it, I have now used license.md
as source1 and updated this package.
Spec URL:
http://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/nodejs-process-nextick-args.spec
SRPM URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #16 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223887
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Jan C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243915
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1131085
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
Boris Ranto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #15 from Bor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383
--- Comment #8 from Marcin Haba ---
@Mosaab
It is in rpm in /usr/bin/mkchroot:47:
yum -y --nogpg --installroot="$directory" --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fcdm
install yum
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
Boris Ranto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
--- Comment #14 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Newer koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10389523
Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/consul/consul.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Kalev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember ---
Nice, thanks Zbigniew! I'll fix these up in both libvpx and the new compat
package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Update:
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/8162d32cbf9e0470aa078d252c2487c9eab125f8
Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/8162d32cbf9e0470aa078d252c2487c9eab125f8/php/php-c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: llvm33-doc : /usr/share/d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243499
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from José Mat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
tunir-0.6-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tunir-0.6-3.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> Are you sure about the license? http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Reflow/
> says "Perl 5 license (artistic 1 and gpl 1)". Source files seem to say
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241838
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241838
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
yubico-piv-tool-1.0.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yubico-piv-tool-1.0.1-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
93 matches
Mail list logo