https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #46 from Pete Walter ---
This review is stalled and a response is needed soon, as per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Reviewer_not_responding
Is there anything left to address, Jeremy?
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236590
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
Only for Rawhide. This package will replace modules bundled to mod_perl. I
usually do these changes in Rawhide only.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459218
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929
--- Comment #19 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Hi René, thanks for the comments!
(In reply to René Cannaò from comment #18)
> I am not sure if Fedora should have jemalloc with xmalloc support, as
> upstream intentionally has this option disabled by d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460515
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236590
Gerd Pokorra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414521
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297852
--- Comment #7 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
- Update to 2.0.0
- Move doc. to a subpackage
Spec URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-sdk/python-azure-sdk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460081
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from David
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460076
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from David
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427085
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427085
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
plantumlqeditor-1.2-9.20170403git964d4ef.fc25 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-909ee326ae
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427085
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
plantumlqeditor-1.2-9.20170403git964d4ef.fc26 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2c6e0cf66b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460081
--- Comment #2 from Owen Taylor ---
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /app/etc, /app, /app/etc/ld.so.conf.d,
/app/cache, /app/etc/fonts, /app/etc/fonts/conf.d
It looks like you had
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460076
--- Comment #2 from Owen Taylor ---
Spec URL: https://people.gnome.org/~otaylor/flatpak-rpm-macros.spec
SRPM URL:
https://people.gnome.org/~otaylor/flatpak-rpm-macros-27-2.fc27.src.rpm
* Tue Jun 13 2017 Owen Taylor - 27-2
- Wrap description
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
--- Comment #25 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #24)
> (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #23)
> > (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #22)
> > > > >
> > > > > > If we agreed on this, are you ok with simp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821406
--- Comment #54 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #53)
> 1. I should make this?
> License:GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD
I fail to see why LGPLv2+ is needed. All kinds of mentioned GPL versions of the
source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458581
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-erusev-parsedown-1.6.2-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e79d7a60ce
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458581
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
php-erusev-parsedown-1.6.2-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-084839649c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458581
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-erusev-parsedown-1.6.2-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f049ee25ea
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458581
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458581
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-erusev-parsedown-1.6.2-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-31c3d3bc90
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460662
Jun Aruga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450590
s...@less-broken.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@less-broken.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458580
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-cilex1-1.1.0-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cd2d6b2d32
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458580
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458578
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpdocumentor-graphviz-1.0.4-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0c2411e9d4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458578
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458579
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458579
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpdocumentor-fileset-1.0.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1b7ac32ffd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
--- Comment #24 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #23)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #22)
> > > >
> > > > > If we agreed on this, are you ok with simply symlinks?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, symlinks are perfect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
--- Comment #23 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #22)
> > >
> > > > If we agreed on this, are you ok with simply symlinks?
> > >
> > > Yes, symlinks are perfectly fine.
>
> Just to ensure convention, those are l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
--- Comment #22 from jiri vanek ---
> >
> > > If we agreed on this, are you ok with simply symlinks?
> >
> > Yes, symlinks are perfectly fine.
Just to ensure convention, those are links, where source (target) is lying
inside jdk, and the li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459218
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460662
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-mustermann
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427085
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/plantumlqeditor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/reg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459914
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929
--- Comment #18 from René Cannaò ---
(In reply to Augusto Caringi from comment #15)
> (In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #12)
> > Per '/usr/share/doc/jemalloc/jemalloc.html':
> >
> > opt.xmalloc (bool) r- [--enable-xmalloc]
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459693
Carl George changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(christos.triantaf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929
--- Comment #17 from René Cannaò ---
(In reply to Augusto Caringi from comment #16)
> (In reply to René Cannaò from comment #13)
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Author of ProxySQL here.
> > First of all, thank you for considering including ProxySQL in Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459693
Carl George changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(carl.george@racks |
|pace.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929
--- Comment #16 from Augusto Caringi ---
(In reply to René Cannaò from comment #13)
> Hi all,
>
> Author of ProxySQL here.
> First of all, thank you for considering including ProxySQL in Fedora
> official repository.
> I will share my thought
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459218
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442471
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433749
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442473
Bug 1442473 depends on bug 1442471, which changed state.
Bug 1442471 Summary: Review Request: php-cache-integration-tests - Integration
tests for PSR-6 and PSR-16 cache implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442471
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442473
Bug 1442473 depends on bug 1442472, which changed state.
Bug 1442472 Summary: Review Request: php-cache-adapter-common - Common classes
for PSR-6 adapters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442472
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442473
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442472
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929
--- Comment #15 from Augusto Caringi ---
(In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #12)
> Per '/usr/share/doc/jemalloc/jemalloc.html':
>
> opt.xmalloc (bool) r- [--enable-xmalloc]
>
> Abort-on-out-of-memory enabled/disabled. If enabled,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459218
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421582
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419034
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419030
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929
--- Comment #14 from René Cannaò ---
As a follow up, support for ARM is already available in branch 1.4.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460932
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460934
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237281
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Any updates? Otherwise I will prefer to close this. Once any update is
available either reopen this review or file a new package review.
Will close this in 2 weeks.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460662
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Vít
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460662
--- Comment #4 from Jun Aruga ---
Vit, thank you for the review.
I fixed those items that you mentioned.
1 point.
> ~~~
> %setup -q -D -T -n %{gem_name}-%{version} -b1 -b2
> ~~~
Below "-b n" looks better regarding the official document'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427085
--- Comment #16 from Damian Wrobel ---
Raphael,
Thank you for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821406
--- Comment #53 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
1. I should make this?
License:GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD
2. If I run eiskaltdcpp-qt it start with my (russian) locale. What do you mean
about "locales for the qt subpackage"?
3. I will remove u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460934
Peng Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460934
Bug ID: 1460934
Summary: Review Request: adobe-source-han-serif-tw-fonts -
Adobe OpenType Pan-CJK font family for Traditional
Chinese
Product: Fedora
Version: ra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460932
Peng Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460932
Bug ID: 1460932
Summary: Review Request: adobe-source-han-serif-cn-fonts -
Adobe OpenType Pan-CJK font family for Simplified
Chinese
Product: Fedora
Version: raw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460662
--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch ---
BTW there appears to be circular dependency with Sinatra, you should consider
to prepare Mustermann for bootstrap.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460662
--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch ---
* Summary/Description
- I'd say that the summary is misleading. The original (but capitalized)
would
be better IMHO.
- The description should start with capital letter.
* Group tag is deprecated
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373001
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Bug ID: 1460917
Summary: Review Request: rpkg - Command-line client tool to
DistGit
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
71 matches
Mail list logo
