[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedo

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- junit-benchmarks-0.7.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/junit-benchmarks-0.7.2-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are o

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving thi

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from gil ca

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #4 from Gerard Ryan --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3) > (In reply to Gerard Ryan from comment #2) > > I'm not sure if the new Github "releases" feature makes it unnecessary (not > > sure how it works), but consider usi

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to Gerard Ryan from comment #2) > I'm not sure if the new Github "releases" feature makes it unnecessary (not > sure how it works), but consider using the full commit hash to refer to the > source

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan --- I'm not sure if the new Github "releases" feature makes it unnecessary (not sure how it works), but consider using the full commit hash to refer to the sources, as advised here, for immutability and uniquene

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Gerard Ryan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Gera

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Gerard Ryan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ger...@ryan.lt Assignee|nob...@

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1002170 -- You are receiving this mai