https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #34 from Yamin ---
Will we get it on Fedora 26?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #33 from haevalen...@gmail.com ---
Fantastic, Budgie Desktop has improved a lot lately and it would be fantastic
availability in fedora or as an additional spin.
However, it has some flaws in usability as the inconsistency of some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #32 from mikey ---
My initial plan was to get this running in a reasonable packaged form on my
Chromebook. But it would be nice to get it packaged up in a state that it could
be included for the community.
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mic...@michel-slm.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #30 from Rex Dieter ---
Oh, and for OnlyShowIn=... I'd recommend patching things to use/recognize
X-Budgie instead for now, at least until Budgie is registered formally.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter ---
Re: .desktop validation in comment #26 ...
You really only need to validate stuff under /usr/share/applications (ie, stuff
intended to be displayed in application menus)
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #28 from mikey ---
I haven't tried to remove "libgnome-volume-control" from my updated spec file
as I'm not sure how to go about it, but perhaps with some guidance we can get
it packaged up in an acceptable form.
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #27 from mikey ---
Created attachment 1121946
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1121946&action=edit
Updated patch for budgie desktop 10.2.2
Here is the updated patch to go along with the spec file.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #26 from mikey ---
Created attachment 1121945
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1121945&action=edit
Updated SPEC for budgie desktop 10.2.2
This is my attempt to update the original spec to budgie desktop 10.2.2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
mikey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abc.mi...@googlemail.com
--- Comment #25 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #24 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
pbrobinson's scratch build of
gnome-dvb-daemon?#451a118009234eac9e3f06f465b00cf93478a5d5 for
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gnome-dvb-daemon?#451a118009234eac9e3f06f465b00cf93478a5d5
and rawh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #23 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
In light of the recent FESCo decision, the bundling would be allowed. Would be
nice to make another attempt at this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #22 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #21 from Manilal ---
It would be really nice if we could include Budgie in Fedora 23. It's really a
good desktop with sleek UI and high performance.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #20 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Will try and find the time to do this in the next couple of days - I don't have
access to Fedora at work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #19 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Ping?
Build for new rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=816.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #18 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
So, I think the FPC decision is suboptimal, but let's try to get this done. Can
you check if you can build budgie with
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8746278? If yes, I'l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #17 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/476#comment:6
The copylib exception is rejected, we'd have to turn libgnome-volume-control
into a shared lib. I'll follow up on the ticket and dev + packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #16 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #15)
> Meanwhile, let's continue the review on the assumption that an exemption
> will be granted (the other packages that uses g-v-c will ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
I just opened a request to determine whether libgnome-volume-control is an
appropriate copylib with FPC: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/476
Meanwhile, let's continue the review on the assum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #14 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Ah, FPC not FESCo. Sorry, there's a link to FESCo in the next paragraph which I
copied by mistake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #13 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
My last comment is wrong. Even if it is a copy library, FESCo is supposed to
give its stamp of approval. Please file a ticket for a bundling exception at
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Ah, OK, that's why I couldn't find it. According to [1] the submodule does not
have a stable api and is supposed to be "linked" wherever it is needed. So
including it in budgie-desktop is al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7)
> budgie bundles https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgnome-volume-control. If I
> read things correctly, it does not use the system version.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Updated spec and SRPM:
https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/desktop/budgie-desktop.spec
https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/desktop/budgie-desktop-8-2.fc21.src.rpm
(In reply to Zbigniew Jęd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
lnxslck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bquei...@gmail.com |
--- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
desktop-file-install should be used. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage.
.appdata.xml file should be added. See
http://people.freedesktop.org/~
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #5)
> On that note, what's the difference between ${prefix} and %prefix% ? Thanks.
Let me try to elaborate.
When building, the *.spec receives values/se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3)
> Some remarks:
>
> +prefix=@prefix@
> +exec_prefix=@prefix@
> +libdir=@libdir@
> +includedir=@includedir@
> +datarootdir=@datarootdir@
>
On that no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3)
> Some remarks:
>
> - The "# Adjust for Fedora's multilib directory layout"
> section from %build is a hack playing with the symtops of an upstream bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #3 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to lnxslck from comment #1)
> I second that. Budgie is a clean and good looking DE, a good alternative for
> those who don't like Gnome or have a computer with less horse power.
Who pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
lnxslck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bquei...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from lnxs
36 matches
Mail list logo
