https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1247925, which changed state.
Bug 1247925 Summary: add ppc64le and aarch64 support for fpc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247925
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Daniel Laskowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dannie...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #30 from Kevin Kofler ---
The main reason is that it is written in FPC/Lazarus, which is not a mainstream
programming language, and which is fairly poorly maintained upstream. There are
bindings (and corresponding backends for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #31 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Daniel Laskowski from comment #29)
> Double Commander is still in development - new version 0.8.0 arrived:)
> https://sourceforge.net/p/doublecmd/news/2017/12/double-commander-080-beta-
> relea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #32 from Daniel Laskowski ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #30)
> The main reason is that it is written in FPC/Lazarus, which is not a
> mainstream programming language, and which is fairly poorly maintained
> upstream.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler ---
It is not the application that's poorly maintained, it's the programming
language (and its standard libraries). This means that packaging applications
written in it are a PITA to package.
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #34 from Kevin Kofler ---
It looks like there is actually a Qt 5 interface now:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Qt5_Interface
but I did not find it yesterday because it is not linked from anywhere in the
Free Pascal wiki. It is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1247925, which changed state.
Bug 1247925 Summary: add ppc64le and aarch64 support for fpc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247925
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1247925, which changed state.
Bug 1247925 Summary: add ppc64le and aarch64 support for fpc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247925
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|doublecmd |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: doublecmd - |Review Request: doublecmd -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(projects.rg@smart
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(projects.rg@smart |
|.ms)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #21 from Raphael Groner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #22 from Raphael Groner ---
Created attachment 1095627
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1095627&action=edit
licensecheck.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #23 from Raphael Groner ---
Created attachment 1095628
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1095628&action=edit
rpmlint.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #24 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
raphgro's scratch build of doublecmd-0.6.6-2.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11895688
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #25 from Raphael Groner ---
SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/doublecmd/doublecmd.spec
SRPM:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/doublecmd/doublecmd-0.6.6-2.fc23.src.rpm
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1247925
--- Comment #26 from Raphael
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|928937 (qt-reviews) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
Referenced B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1209477
--- Comment #8 from Raphael
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/doublecmd/doublecmd.spec
SRPM:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/doublecmd/doublecmd-0.6.4-1.fc22.src.rpm
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch ---
Last time I discussed the .zdli with upstream, they insisted that we should
distribute also the .zdli, although we have possibly debuginfo available and
that we should use the "beta" target for build. I kno
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #10)
> Last time I discussed the .zdli with upstream, they insisted that we should
> distribute also the .zdli, although we have possibly debuginfo available and
> t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
FTBFS for arch i686:
…
+ /usr/bin/lazbuild src/doublecmd.lpi --bm=beta --widgetset=gtk2 --cpu=i386
…
TProject.DoLoadStateFile Statefile not found:
/builddir/build/BUILD/doublecmd-0.6.4/units/i386-linux-g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #11)
> Though, I don't see any reason why "beta" target is needed, do you mean to
> put in Release? Version 0.6.4 is official with no beta hint at all, the zero
> in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner ---
> [1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/vondruch/doublecmd/
I decided to not like building from subversion, at least not for an official
package and if there's no patch needed.
FTBFS is magically fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1209477, which changed state.
Bug 1209477 Summary: lazarus-1.4.2-0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209477
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng ---
I'm thinking about using alternative command to make 2 packages existing in one
system.
Thoughts?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng ---
I'm also against that as default doublecmd is built with gtk2 widget.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #17 from Raphael Groner ---
Christopher, what are you talking about?
The difference between qt and gtk2 is handled with subpackages. I fail to see
any trouble with that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BuildFails |
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com |
|/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter ---
naming: ok
licensing: ok
sources: ok
926bd7bea6bccd2c618d97d39cc7d4ad doublecmd-0.6.4-src.tar.gz
1. MUST use desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate for application
.desktop files, see
http://fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: doublecmdt |Review Request: doublecmd -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||BuildFails
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1215643, which changed state.
Bug 1215643 Summary: ERROR: Broken dependency: KASComp 1.8>KASComp 1.8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215643
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1215643, which changed state.
Bug 1215643 Summary: ERROR: Broken dependency: KASComp 1.8>KASComp 1.8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215643
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
It turns out that lazbuild needs a bugfix to get some doublecmd build success.
> Lazarus 1.4 has a bug in lazbuild utility. I wrote about it to Lazarus
> bugtracker and it was fixed (revisions 48892,4889
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
Upstream announced version 0.6.2 beta. I'll try to update the package soon.
http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net/mantisbt/changelog_page.php?version_id=34
If there'll still be build issues as it turns out fo
44 matches
Mail list logo
