https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
bup-0.27-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
bup-0.27-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #26 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
bup-0.27-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7349d4e979
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #24 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
bup-0.27-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c35b007349
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/bup
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #21 from Tadej Janež ---
William, thanks again for the review and approval!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #20 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #19 from Tadej Janež ---
William,
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #18)
> There is a unversioned .so library than you must package as a -devel
> subpackage or request upstream to use a versioned version of the file.
>
> P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #18 from William Moreno ---
There is a unversioned .so library than you must package as a -devel subpackage
or request upstream to use a versioned version of the file.
Please see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guideline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #17 from Tadej Janež ---
Hi William,
thanks for a re-review!
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #9)
> you should ask upstream about python3 support
> as part of:
>
> http://portingdb-encukou.rhcloud.com/
Agreed, I'll ask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #16 from William Moreno ---
Thanks Dan for the feedbak about the s390 build, so please fix the macros in
%postun.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #15 from William Moreno ---
Last review here:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/295213/48646777/
Fix the empty %postun in the spec.
Include the ExcludeArch tag about the s390 arch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #14 from Dan Ho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #13 from William Moreno ---
rpmlint bup-web-0.27-0.3.fc24.x86_64.rpm
bup-web.x86_64: W: empty-%postun
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
williamjmorenor's scratch build of bup-0.27-0.3.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11988462
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||485231
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #10 from William Moreno ---
Test Build:
s390: http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1993939
ppc: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2935262
arm: http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #9 from William Moreno ---
I will run again the review, you should ask upstream about python3 support as
part of:
http://portingdb-encukou.rhcloud.com/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #8 from Tadej Janež ---
Hi William,
thanks for the review!
Sorry that it took so long to reply. While fixing the package, I encountered
some problems that needed quite some time to get fixed.
(In reply to William Moreno from com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tadej's scratch build of bup-0.27-0.2.fc21.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11445764
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
I see in the last build than %%prep %%build and %%install work fine, but the
issue is with the test, maybe disabling test for now and work with upstream or
pathing the faling tests can work.
WvTest: 2432
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tadej's scratch build of bup-0.27-0.2.fc21.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11361744
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tadej's scratch build of bup-0.27-0.1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11361477
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #2 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
Need Work:
[ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
williamjmorenor's scratch build of bup-0.27-0.1.fc21.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11351834
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
32 matches
Mail list logo