https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
Bug 1270317 depends on bug 1282063, which changed state.
Bug 1282063 Summary: Review Request: xxhsum - Extremely fast hash algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1503461
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
lz4-java-1.3.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
lz4-java-1.3.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7c436d5d72
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/lz4-java
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Repik ---
All right, I've already (accidentally) set the fedora-review flag to "+" so the
package is ready to proceed to next phase.
I would just include the link to the FPC ticket in the spec file anyway.
Thank you.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
FPC ticket was closed:
Resolution: nothingtodo
"
Comment:
FPC no longer has anything to do with bundling. Please see the current
guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bundl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #10)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9)
> > see
> > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:
> > No_Bundled_Libraries&oldid=406058#Requirement_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #8)
> Now I know why:
> > lz4-java.x86_64: E: no-binary
> > > add BuildArchitectures: noarch to the SPEC file
> > No, this will never happen
the build depends on the a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #8 from Tomas Repik ---
Now I know why:
> lz4-java.x86_64: E: no-binary
> > add BuildArchitectures: noarch to the SPEC file
> No, this will never happen
> lz4-java.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> > There are only non binary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
> (In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #5)
> > rmplint results
> > lz4-java.src:42: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(libxxhash)
> > > include a version
Done
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #5)
> rmplint results
>
> lz4-java.x86_64: E: no-binary
> > add BuildArchitectures: noarch to the SPEC file
No, this will never happen
> lz4-java.x86_64: W: only-non-b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #5 from Tomas Repik ---
rmplint results
lz4-java.x86_64: E: no-binary
> add BuildArchitectures: noarch to the SPEC file
lz4-java.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of lz4-java-1.3.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12945998
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tre...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1282063
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/lz4-java.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/lz4-java-1.3.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of lz4-java-1.3.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11387051
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
26 matches
Mail list logo
