https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7, freedv-1.1-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freedv-1.1-5.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-d007a8affa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7, freedv-1.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #33 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-86353fa95c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #31 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.5-1.el7 freed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/freedv
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #20 from Richard Shaw ---
Thanks for the thorough review and patience!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #18 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
sagitter's scratch build of freedv-1.1-4.fc22.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12633479
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
sagitter's scratch build of freedv-1.1-4.fc22.src.rpm for epel7 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12633419
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
> appstream-util check is failed.
> Add dconf as BuildRequires and Requires package.
Turns out it just didn't like my use of . It still shows the
same error b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande ---
appstream-util check is failed.
Add dconf as BuildRequires and Requires package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #14 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-4.fc22.src.rpm
* Wed Jan 20 2016 Richard Shaw - 1.1-4
- Create appdata file.
Got derailed by th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #12)
> Hardened builds are required for all packages:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages
It's not required as freedv does not meet any of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #10)
> Ok, I've taken care of the sox issue but I'm not exactly sure what to do
> about PIC/PIE... Since freedv is not a daemon or "long running application"
> I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #11 from Richard Shaw ---
Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec
SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-3.fc22.src.rpm
* Tue Dec 8 2015 Richard Shaw - 1.1-3
- Add sox to sources so it is not do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #10 from Richard Shaw ---
Ok, I've taken care of the sox issue but I'm not exactly sure what to do about
PIC/PIE... Since freedv is not a daemon or "long running application" I'm not
sure full RELO is required but I would prefer it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7)
> - A temporary bundling of Sox libraries is permitted but you cannot download
> Sox during build process, i think.
You're right, I didn't even think about that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande ---
> 'freedv' executable file results Not PIE, Partial RELRO. Some compiler/linker
> flags are missing.
- 'freedv' executable file is 'Not PIE, Partial RELRO'. Some compiler/linker
flags are missing.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
- A temporary bundling of Sox libraries is permitted but you cannot download
Sox during build process, i think.
- 'freedv' executable file results Not PIE, Partial RELRO. Some compiler/linker
flags are m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw ---
Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec
SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
Fixed dist tag in the link since I've upgraded Fedora releases since this was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw ---
Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec
SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
* Fri Dec 4 2015 Richard Shaw - 1.1-2
- Move to bundled sox to work around
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #4 from Richard Shaw ---
Darn, I forgot about that. With the sox 14.4.2 release they made a bunch of
previously public functions private. The only workaround for now is bundling
sox which I don't want to do but it's currently accep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
Linking fails:
/builddir/build/BUILD/freedv-1.1/src/sox_biquad.c:97: undefined reference to
`lsx_biquad_flow'
/builddir/build/BUILD/freedv-1.1/src/sox_biquad.c:97: undefined reference to
`lsx_biquad_flow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
--- Comment #2 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
> %if 0%{?fedora} > 21
> BuildRequires: speexdsp-devel
> %else
I'll probably leave it in for one release as someone may want to build
themselves.
> - %{!?_li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
44 matches
Mail list logo
