https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
Carl George changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #18 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
build fails [1] in F24 and rawhide , but builds on F23 !?!
[1]
[100%] Building manpage documentation
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/rpg-rpg-0.0.5-1/doc &&
PYTHONPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/rpg-rpg-0.0.5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #16 from Pavol Vican ---
It should be fixed.
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/master/rpg.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nightly/rpg/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00162843-rpg/rpg-0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
The sources are contained in the SRPM, and this is enough to build packages.
After the package is approved and imported into dist git, when building in koji
the sources are downloaded from t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #14 from Ranjan Maitra ---
> OTOH, "No upstream for (Source0): rpg-0.0.5.tar.gz" is a valid complains. A
> full URL should be used.
But does this not have to be fixed for the package building to proceed? That is
my point.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #12 from Ranjan Maitra ---
(In reply to Jan Silhan from comment #11)
> I am sorry for delay. Rawhide build fixed and I am providing new links. I am
> not sure whether the `-b` option in fedora-review will work. Link to spec in
> co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #11 from Jan Silhan ---
I am sorry for delay. Rawhide build fixed and I am providing new links. I am
not sure whether the `-b` option in fedora-review will work. Link to spec in
comment 2 cannot be invalidated.
Spec URL:
https://r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #10 from Ranjan Maitra ---
(In reply to Jan Silhan from comment #9)
> links from comment 0 are invalidated now. Try it again, please.
Great, thanks! But: I now get:
$ fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1280422
INFO: Proc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #9 from Jan Silhan ---
links from comment 0 are invalidated now. Try it again, please.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #8 from Ranjan Maitra ---
I tried using fedora-review tool on this, but it appears that there two
src.rpms therefore there is a conflict.
$ fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1280422
ERROR: Expected to find single reb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Yes. It's unassigned, and the fedora-review flag isn't set. So, it does need
review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
Ranjan Maitra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||itsme_...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
--- Comment #4 from Kev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
--- Comment #2 from Jan Silhan ---
Fixed, these links should not contain different content type:
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/4b321abe5942dd653f7269a6716f0134cfefdb3d/rpg.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||projects...@smart.ms
--- Comment #1
19 matches
Mail list logo
