https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-nesty
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
Pavel Valena changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
pvalena's scratch build of rubygem-nesty-1.0.2-1.fc24.src.rpm for f24-candidate
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12040858
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
Christos Triantafyllidis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Valena ---
Hi Christos,
> - There should not be Requires: ruby(release), unless you want to explicitly
* I have thought the same first, but this is meant for 'Requires', not
'BuildRequires'. Ensuring cruby during th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
--- Comment #3 from Christos Triantafyllidis
---
Hello Pavel,
My comment was based on that (from the ruby guidelines you linked):
- There should not be Requires: ruby(release), unless you want to explicitly
specify Ruby version compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
--- Comment #2 from Pavel Valena ---
Hi Christos,
regarding those BuildRequires:
* These are false positives. There is nothing against mentioned
in the Guidelines[1]. Explicit requirement ensures building it with cruby.
> Are you planning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
Christos Triantafyllidis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284635
Christos Triantafyllidis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christos.triantafyllidis@gm
