https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #21 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3cc7c1c581
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #19 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #17)
> --- SPECS/old/HdrHistogram.spec 2016-03-03 15:58:04.925801810 +0100
> +++ SPECS/HdrHistogram.spec 2016-03-07 12:37:58.916005527 +0100
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/HdrHistogram
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #17 from Tomas Repik ---
--- SPECS/old/HdrHistogram.spec2016-03-03 15:58:04.925801810 +0100
+++ SPECS/HdrHistogram.spec2016-03-07 12:37:58.916005527 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: HdrHistogram
Version: 2.1.8
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #16 from jiri vanek ---
Yah, you are right with flags.
About the c#15 - was there some change against the original one i approved?
If so, please post diff!
I short time I should be able to sponsor you.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #15 from Tomas Repik ---
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL:
https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23.src.rpm
* Mon Mar 07 2016 Tomas Repik - 2.1.8-1
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #14 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #12)
> Not sure how your other requests, but this oen was missing fedora-review=?
> If your other requestsd are missing it, set it for your own good.
I think the reviewe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tre...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tre...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #10 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #9)
> 48: %jpackage_script org.fedoraproject.helloworld.HelloWorld "" "" %{name}
> helloworld true
Done.
> Also I would go with %{_bindir}
Done.
Also installed and trie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #9 from jiri vanek ---
Hello!
You tried to install this package+launcher and it worked?
I did not, but:
cp HistogramLogProcessor %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/HistogramLogProcessor
Can never work.
Even ig, it is against all guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #8 from Tomas Repik ---
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-2.fc23.src.rpm
* Wed Mar 02 2016 Tomas Repik - 2.1.8-2
- launcher HistogramLogProces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #7 from jiri vanek ---
I can agree on it. But Still I would say - upstream have an launcher =>
include launcher.
No subpackage needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #6 from Tomas Repik ---
Well, first of all thanks for the review, I appreciate it.
> Thoughts?
For me it's more like a library than a real runable application although it
would make sense as well. I could try and create something
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jva...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jva...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #3 from jiri vanek ---
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
Unless there is some reason I cant see, i probably insists execution of tests
during build. there is even junit in In original sources.
[!]: Package functions as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #2 from jiri vanek ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010003 (bigdata-review)
Referenced B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bu
29 matches
Mail list logo