https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #42 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Man, I'm sorry. This is really frustrating, and I totally understand why
you're throwing in the towel. :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #40 from Jonathan Dieter ---
They're coming from requirements.txt. See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_automatically_generated_dependencies
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #39 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Weird. I'm definitely not generating those narrow restrictions of versions. Any
idea where they might be coming from?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #38 from Jonathan Dieter ---
I'd really like to see this move forward, but I can't even install it right
now, in either Rawhide or F32:
sudo /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
--releasever 33 --se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #37 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Updated this to latest version, which now fully supports Python 3 and drops
Python 2 support.
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43882055
SRPM:
https://kojipkgs.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1432701
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #36 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I am, but the 1.7 series (the latest release of linchpin) requires Shade >=
1.30.0. The latest version packaged for Rawhide is 1.27.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #35 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Greg, last I checked, we were almost finished with this. Are you still
interested in moving forward with this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #34 from Jonathan Dieter ---
(In reply to greg.hellings from comment #33)
> > The issues that still need to be resolved:
> >
> > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> > License should be GP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #33 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
> The issues that still need to be resolved:
>
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> License should be GPLv3+ and BSD
I'm not sure why you're flagging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #32 from Jonathan Dieter ---
The issues that still need to be resolved:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License should be GPLv3+ and BSD
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #31 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #30 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Good catch on the docs/doc difference. I've updated the name of that and fixed
its depends. Updated versions of the files pushed:
Spec: https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/linchpin/linchpin.s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Nicely done, but the requires for the -docs is wrong. linchpin is noarch, so
it should be Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}. As it is, I'm unable
to actually install linchpin-docs.
Also, not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #28 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Upstream release 1.6.4 today which fixes the doc build issue. I've uploaded an
SRPM that takes advantage of that to include a docs subpackage as well as
adding the README.rst to as a %doc inclusi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Dieter ---
(In reply to greg.hellings from comment #26)
> The docs are to build the readthedocs page. They don't build in Python 3 due
> to issues with imports. I have reported this upstream as
> https://github.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #26 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
The docs are to build the readthedocs page. They don't build in Python 3 due to
issues with imports. I have reported this upstream as
https://github.com/CentOS-PaaS-SIG/linchpin/issues/701
I've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Ok, there still a few issues. First off, it looks like there's documentation
in source, but no documentation seems to be installed as part of the package.
Am I missing something? If not, can we pleas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(greg.hellings@gma |
|il.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
Jonathan Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greg.helli...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Dieter ---
(In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #22)
> (In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #21)
> > Great, thanks.
> >
> > rpmlint is complaining about a number of empty hidden files in the RPM. Do
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Dieter ---
(In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #21)
> Great, thanks.
>
> rpmlint is complaining about a number of empty hidden files in the RPM. Do
> you know why they're there? If they're actually there
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Great, thanks.
rpmlint is complaining about a number of empty hidden files in the RPM. Do you
know why they're there? If they're actually there for a reason, then we'll
ignore rpmlint, but if they're
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #20 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Oh, yeah. I push them both every time, but the URL didn't change:
Spec: https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/linchpin/linchpin.spec
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/linchpin/linchp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Great. Do you mind posting the updated spec too? It makes it easier for
fedora-review to run.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #18 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
New SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/linchpin/linchpin-1.6.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
I updated all Python dependencies to Python 3.
There were some dependency version problems in Rawhide with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #17 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Ah, Rawhide Ansible package has shifted to Python 3, thus invalidating all of
the Python 2 BRs. I'll update as appropriate and post a new SRPM in a few
minutes.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Created attachment 1481259
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1481259&action=edit
Build log
Just tried to build this in mock and got a failure. It looks like it's trying
to download a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Yeah, I'll go ahead and do this. Sorry about the delay in getting back to you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #14 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Jonathan, any chance you could look at this or would you rather let someone
else tackle it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #13 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
OK, giving this another go:
Spec file: https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/linchpin/linchpin.spec
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/linchpin/linchpin-1.5.4-1.fc28.src.rpm
The %prep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #12 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
OK, I guess I better do this. Upstream started asking again if I was going to
finish it up. Stay tuned, Friday is my designated Fedora Package day for the
week.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Any news on this? If not, I'll go ahead and remove myself from this and leave
the bug as NEW.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Yeah, sounds good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #9 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
It's a Bash completion script, so it's not intended to be run at all, rather
sourced.
It looks like that should be placed in /etc/bash_completion.d/ rather than in
/usr/bin. I'll update to have t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Yep, that would be the one. If it's a script that's meant to run by linchpin
(as opposed to the user), then it should probably go in /usr/libexec/linchpin.
As for whether or not it needs a shebang, if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #7 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
OK, the shebang and spurious file permissions are easy enough to fix. I'm
curious which executable you think should have a shebang. Is it
linchpin_complete.sh? Those completion scripts are not sup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #6 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Agreed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Ok, if it's all right with you, then, I'll go ahead and do the review once
you've published the 1.0 package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #4 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I'll update the shebang/permissions issues, including sending a PR upstream.
As for the packages, this issue has been addressed in upstream and will be
released in their 1.0 milestone (due out th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Dieter ---
Created attachment 1276746
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1276746&action=edit
rpmlint output
Ok, we've got the dependencies in Fedora, so let's do this. There are a couple
things t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
Bug 1441843 depends on bug 1441841, which changed state.
Bug 1441841 Summary: Review Request: python-camel - Python serialization for
adults
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441841
What|Removed |Ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
Bug 1441843 depends on bug 1441842, which changed state.
Bug 1441842 Summary: Review Request: python-yamlordereddictloader - YAML loader
for PyYAML that maintains key order
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441842
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
Jonathan Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1441841 (python-camel),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #1 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
n.b. If you're testing basic functionality, this program only runs on Fedora
26+ due to its dependency versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
48 matches
Mail list logo