https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
--- Comment #8 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rttr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Sure, done one day ago https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32359
I will wait next week, probably some vacation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
--- Comment #6 from Sergio Basto ---
by Step 7 of documentation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors
you need do: fedpkg request-repo rttr 1932616
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
Sergio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Thanks for spotting this issue. I've fixed locally.
The packaging guideline enforces the name of the source package to be the same
as the archive name. But it's possible for a library only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
--- Comment #3 from Sergio Basto ---
Created attachment 1759462
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1759462=edit
rttr.spec.patch
Hi,
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Spec URL: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/rttr.spec
SRPM URL: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/rttr-0.9.6-3.fc33.src.rpm
Description: Run Time Type Reflection
Fedora Account System Username:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Basto ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
Sergio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
10 matches
Mail list logo