Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #59 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-11-04
10:54:07 EDT ---
All of you, please stop.
It seems clear from the lack of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #58 from Iang 2011-11-04 10:10:59 EDT ---
Matt,
> [2 CAs] let me do this anonymously at my own risk if I validate
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #57 from Iang 2011-11-04 09:56:59 EDT ---
Look beyond the labels for a moment, and look at the actions.
* you c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #56 from Matt McCutchen 2011-11-04
01:12:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> Your term
> "relying" is what we ca
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #55 from Iang 2011-11-03 09:20:57 EDT ---
Comment #53, continuing in reverse order:
> (In reply to comment #46)
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #54 from Iang 2011-11-03 07:28:06 EDT ---
Matt, comment #53
> (In reply to comment #51)
> > If for example we had a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #53 from Matt McCutchen 2011-11-03
03:34:48 EDT ---
Phillip and Ian,
Please spare us the self-righteousness and th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #52 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-11-02
10:33:15 EDT ---
If any of you CA-Cert folks are lawyers, please indicate t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #51 from Iang 2011-11-02 05:43:41 EDT ---
Matt writes in comment #44:
> > Imagine we get sued for
> > some bank clas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #50 from Iang 2011-11-02 05:25:12 EDT ---
A couple of additional caveats:
1. Startcom is a different kettle of fis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #49 from Iang 2011-11-02 05:16:31 EDT ---
Matt,
did you read the RPA from Verisign?
"IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #48 from Philipp Dunkel 2011-11-02 05:12:05
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> (In reply to comment #45)
> > (In r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #47 from Philipp Dunkel 2011-11-02 05:08:21
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> (In reply to comment #41)
> > The o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #46 from Philipp Dunkel 2011-11-02 05:03:43
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> (In reply to comment #44)
> > (In r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #45 from Matt McCutchen 2011-11-02
04:50:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> (In reply to comment #43)
> > All C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #44 from Matt McCutchen 2011-11-02
04:45:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> However
> we cannot disclaim the li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #43 from Iang 2011-11-01 10:19:52 EDT ---
One other point: Our policies are written to be fair, honest, and up-fron
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
Iang changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
Philipp Dunkel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #40 from Matt McCutchen 2011-02-03
15:56:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> Companies choose to take those risk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #39 from Rod Montgomery 2011-02-03 15:40:44
EST ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> A priori, I don't need CAcert's per
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #38 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-02-03
11:25:29 EST ---
I agree with Matt here. If CAcert's position is that their
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #37 from Matt McCutchen 2011-02-02
17:53:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> Without some reconsideration, it ap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
Rod Montgomery changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #35 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-08-06 09:56:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> CACert should simply disla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #34 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-08-06
09:19:11 EDT ---
So, unfortunately, Red Hat Legal, upon reviewing the licen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #33 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-08-03 08:13:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> Sascha, can you be tempte
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #32 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-08-02 06:42:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> The %post and %preun scrip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #31 from David Woodhouse 2010-07-30 08:18:35
EDT ---
The %post and %preun scripts look like they'll be fine for now
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #30 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-07-30 06:51:16 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://sspreitzer.fedorapeople.org/ca-cacert
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #29 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-07-30 06:31:06 EDT ---
The intention of that paragraph is to keep away lawyer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #28 from Matt McCutchen 2010-07-29
14:21:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Alright. With that definition of RE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #27 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-07-29
11:50:51 EDT ---
Alright. With that definition of RELY, it means they provi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #26 from Matt McCutchen 2010-07-29
11:37:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> I suspect they mean "RELY" in the s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #25 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-07-29 11:07:04 EDT ---
The license was checked by RedHat legal department and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-07-29
11:04:05 EDT ---
I suspect they mean "RELY" in the sense of "Depend upon ex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #23 from Matt McCutchen 2010-07-29
10:55:51 EDT ---
I'm puzzled by this part of the license:
"THIS LICENSE SPECIFI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-07-29
10:32:28 EDT ---
My only remaining concern is that the license still seems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #21 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-07-29 07:14:34 EDT ---
The relicensing is finished, please take a look on the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-06-28
08:48:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> @spot; That is an intersting p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #19 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-06-28 07:34:22 EDT ---
@spot; That is an intersting point though. I for mysel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #18 from Sascha Silbe
2010-06-28 07:15:41 EDT ---
I'm neither a Fedora developer nor an experienced Fedora user, ju
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #17 from Matthias Saou 2010-06-28 05:02:35
EDT ---
I'm fine with anyone else more involved to work on getting the C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #16 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-06-27
20:32:00 EDT ---
Just noting that CC-BY-ND is not a Free Creative Commons l
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #15 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-06-26 20:16:57 EDT ---
Please read this carefully and take action!
Your vote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #14 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
2010-06-26 08:33:52 EDT ---
@Matthias; Is it OK with you to close this bug?
I wan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Saou 2010-04-08 05:31:18
EDT ---
Thanks, David, very interesting feedback.
The %{class1hash}.0 f
47 matches
Mail list logo
