https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
Jan Klepek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann ---
The latest commits to Buzzbird's Git repo [1] are older than two years, that's
why we can safely assume that upstream is dead. I don't expect to get a working
package in Fedora ever, because we can't scr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Aillon 2011-05-09
16:50:20 EDT ---
Sure, but you're generating the source tarball anyway, stri
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek 2011-05-09 03:26:11 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > this does n
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2011-03-10 06:29:01 EST
---
updated spec/srpm
Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2011-03-09 15:16:46 EST
---
this does not apply to source tarball as far as I know, no bundled/p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Aillon 2011-03-08 13:35:41
EST ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2011-03-08 10:49:03 EST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > 1] buzzbird.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Aillon 2011-03-08 09:58:56
EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 1] buzzbird.exe is not present in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2011-03-08 03:34:36 EST
---
Hi,
1] buzzbird.exe is not present in final rpm, so what's your poi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Aillon 2011-02-16 15:43:17
EST ---
* Your source tarball includes a few binary files including
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2011-01-08 18:55:16 EST
---
rpmlint output:
buzzbird.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) i
14 matches
Mail list logo