[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2017-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- (In reply to James Hogarth from comment #13) > There has not been any comment in a long time. > > Are you intending to progress this? > > If there is no response within a week this bug will be clos

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||james.hoga...@gmail.com,

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell 2012-03-28 09:54:25 EDT --- Latest upstream version, 110.74 should also build on 3.x kernels.

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 Robert Knight changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2012-01-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 Simon Green changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 --- Comment #7 from Brock Organ 2011-10-22 12:02:51 EDT --- Hi Ricky, What is the next part of the review request? Regards, B

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 Brock Organ changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 --- Comment #6 from Brock Organ 2011-10-22 11:38:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > From a fresh F15 install For others try

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 --- Comment #5 from Brock Organ 2011-10-22 11:29:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hey, glad to have some eyes on this packa

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 --- Comment #4 from Ricky Zhou 2011-10-21 12:21:02 EDT --- Hey, glad to have some eyes on this package :-) It doesn't build on

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 Brock Organ changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 --- Comment #3 from Brock Organ 2011-10-21 10:09:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not able to build with this spec file

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 Brock Organ changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-05-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088 --- Comment #1 from Ricky Zhou 2011-05-30 03:20:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/smlnj.spec SRPM UR