[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component __

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Troy Dawson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tdaw...@redhat.com Flags|fedo

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-27 10:27:42 EST --- rubygem-idn-0.0.2-7.fc16 has been submitted as an update

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla 2012-02-27 10:08:11 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https:/

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Mo Morsi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #24 from Shawn Starr 2012-02-23 17:22:27 EST --- Please do request commit, never can have enough maintainers :) eve

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #23 from Mo Morsi 2012-02-23 15:09:40 EST --- Could this be pushed into Fedora 16 as well. rubygem-webmock will be b

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2012-01-11 20:35:17 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https:/

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #19 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-11 11:31:24 EST --- Can I get an update from the SCM team on this approval? -- Confi

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #18 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-02 15:07:26 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ruby

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #17 from Shawn Starr 2011-12-20 12:40:59 EST --- I will be pushing this today was blocked due to fedora filer issue

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 James Laska changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #15 from Mo Morsi 2011-11-28 07:31:52 EST --- For some reason the '+' isn't available as an option for the fedora-re

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch 2011-11-22 03:46:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > Removed copy %{SOURCE0}. I originally

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch 2011-11-22 03:44:43 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > Removed copy %{SOURCE0}. I originally

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #12 from Shawn Starr 2011-11-21 22:45:29 EST --- Vit feedback is added: using:testrb -Ilib test/tc_*.rb Removed c

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #11 from Mo Morsi 2011-11-10 11:48:41 EST --- OK thanks for the update - looks like you addressed all my feedback

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #9 from Shawn Starr 2011-11-06 02:07:17 EST --- Stripped out non-gem, since we're not doing this any more (as menti

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 James Laska changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #7 from Shawn Starr 2011-10-26 23:54:31 EDT --- Yes, I've just been swamped with RL stuff, I hope to look at this a

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #6 from Mo Morsi 2011-10-26 14:18:46 EDT --- ping? could you fix the issues described in my review. rubygem-addressa

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #4 from Shawn Starr 2011-10-07 15:54:20 EDT --- The Ruby SIG team would need to be engaged they have a mailing list

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #3 from Mo Morsi 2011-10-07 06:47:01 EDT --- Sounds good. Good to know that the packaging rubygems for non-gem use g

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #2 from Shawn Starr 2011-10-06 20:30:59 EDT --- I will fix however, Ruby is going to 1.9.3 in Fedora 17 which is go

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Mo Morsi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---