https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
Amit Saha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #14 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Amit, have you searched for a sponsor yet?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=E
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #13 from Amit Saha ---
New upstream release. Updated files:
SPEC: https://github.com/amitsaha/rpm_spec/raw/master/python-picloud.spec
SRPM:
https://github.com/amitsaha/rpm_spec/blob/master/python-picloud-2.5.6-1.fc17.src.rpm
--
Yo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #12 from Amit Saha 2012-03-23 22:47:18 EDT
---
New upstream release. Updated files:
SPEC:
http://amitksaha.fedorap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
Christoph Wickert changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #11 from Amit Saha 2012-03-13 22:08:41 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Please look at these examples:
>
> http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #10 from Volker Fröhlich 2012-03-11 13:22:01 EDT
---
Please look at these examples:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #9 from Amit Saha 2012-03-09 18:48:20 EST
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Please always bump the release when you ch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #8 from Volker Fröhlich 2012-03-09 11:07:15 EST
---
Please always bump the release when you change something and po
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #7 from Amit Saha 2012-03-09 09:43:16 EST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It's not LGPLv2 but LGPLv2+. APL 2.0 and L
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #6 from Amit Saha 2012-03-06 19:48:32 EST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 568090 [details]
> buil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich 2012-03-06 17:57:28 EST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
You're getting me wrong here. I'm ref
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #4 from Matěj Cepl 2012-03-06 17:44:57 EST ---
Created attachment 568090
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2012-03-06 09:09:54 EST
---
It's not LGPLv2 but LGPLv2+. APL 2.0 and LGPLv2 are not compati
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #2 from Amit Saha 2012-03-05 02:29:10 EST
---
Thanks for your comments:
(In reply to comment #1)
> Just a few comm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
--- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich 2012-03-05 02:08:00 EST
---
Just a few comments:
- Harmonize on either using $RPM_BUILD_RO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
18 matches
Mail list logo