[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-04-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2012-03-24 19:17:06 EDT --- picketbox-4.0.6-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update fo

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-23 11:00:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Ricardo Arguello changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #6 from Ricardo Arguello 2012-03-22 19:47:13 EDT --- Fixed! Spec URL: http://ricardo.fedorapeople.org/package_revi

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann 2012-03-22 13:48:46 EDT --- Package Review == Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Proble

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #4 from Ricardo Arguello 2012-03-17 00:54:53 EDT --- Done! Spec URL: http://ricardo.fedorapeople.org/package_revie

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann 2012-03-16 11:22:06 EDT --- Please also remove the "-a "org.picketbox:picketbox" part. --

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann 2012-03-16 07:33:05 EDT --- Created attachment 570584 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/atta

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann 2012-03-16 06:00:44 EDT --- Ricardo, we need to remove geronimo-jpa from R and BR, and speci

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Ricardo Arguello changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Ricardo Arguello changed: What|Removed |Added --