[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-19 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-17 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- no-soname is usual for just dlopen'ed objects (objects not under %_libdir but under the subdirectory of %_libdir). Also undefined-non-weak-symbol is no problem

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- scratch build: F-19 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4946445 F-18 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4946467 -- You are receiving

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review?

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 --- Comment #5 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com --- OK, I'm happy with the LGPLv2+. Here's the full review. I'll approve if you can just provide feedback on: - rpmlint issues (see end of review) - confirmation

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 --- Comment #2 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com --- I can't find a license for the this package. Headers states LGPLv2+ but the website states GPLv2+. The website license also states that the license file should be

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 --- Comment #3 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com --- Also, upstream have released 1.2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Thank you for review. I will update this package to 1.2.1 later. (In reply to comment #2) I can't find a license for the this package. Headers states LGPLv2+

[Bug 892163] Review Request: rubygem-gobject-introspection - Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection

2013-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892163 Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|