https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
No owners specified.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #27 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
@Ratnadeep -
Yup.
Perhaps we should open a new ticket given that mesos is already in f21 and out
the door.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #25 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com ---
Hey Timothy,
Could you please elaborate on what do you mean by drag in the missing
transitive dependencies? During the build, I saw some extra packages being
downloaded and installed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rtn...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #24 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
Ratnadeep you would need to drag in the missing transitive dependencies into
epel in order to make that happen.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
bigdata-sig is not a valid FAS account.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #22 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #17 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
Updated, same URLs. Notes are inlined below.
- mesos must BuildRequire: python2-devel. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires
- done
- The spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #13 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
stout is now retired as a separate package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #14 from Will Benton wi...@redhat.com ---
The generated tarball policy doesn't apply in this case if there is nothing in
the upstream tarball that we're legally encumbered from uploading to SCM.
Please move the bundled library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #15 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
updated, with same urls.
You will notice I conditionalized the .spec file around that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #16 from Will Benton wi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Timothy St. Clair from comment #15)
updated, with same urls.
You will notice I conditionalized the .spec file around that.
I did! Thanks for changing the default
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #10 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
Updated, I believe I've addressed all the items listed above. I've removed the
sub-packaging too, as it doesn't exist anywhere else. I will need to remove
any other sub-packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #11 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
I will need to remove any other sub-packages that exist.
from fedora respos
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #12 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
Update includes a generate-tarball.sh mod with switched to dual purpose the
spec file, in the vain that some day we can just pull directly from github.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #7 from Will Benton wi...@redhat.com ---
Some issues here, but the most serious one is bundling. (It basically doesn't
matter that upstream is bundling.)
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #8 from Will Benton wi...@redhat.com ---
We also need to work from a pristine source and a patchset. Since the delta
between upstream and Tim's fork is very large (primarily due to removing
binaries), the package should probably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #9 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
mesos-devel should own %{includedir}/mesos. Currently stout and
libprocess are in there as well, but these
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #6 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
updated spec: http://tstclair.fedorapeople.org/mesos/mesos.spec
updated srpm:
http://tstclair.fedorapeople.org/mesos/mesos-0.16.0-1.d3557e8.fc21.src.rpm
Notes:
mesos.x86_64: E:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #5 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
Any update?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010003
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
35 matches
Mail list logo
