https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
cli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm-git-tag-sort
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to clime7 from comment #9)
> Ok, great. I think it should be rather marked as 'W'.
>
> Anyway, do you have some package you would like me to review?
Not at the moment, thank you.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #9 from cli...@gmail.com ---
Ok, great. I think it should be rather marked as 'W'.
Anyway, do you have some package you would like me to review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
It's a rpmlint warning: explicit-lib-dependency, not mandatory, just a
recommendation. See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_explicit_requires
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #7 from cli...@gmail.com ---
So requires are unnecessary because they will dynamically added by rpm. I still
don't think this should be an error. There is rarely anything wrong with being
explicit instead of implicit (in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to clime7 from comment #5)
> - These should be autodetected:
>
> rpm-git-tag-sort.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgit2
> rpm-git-tag-sort.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #5 from cli...@gmail.com ---
- These should be autodetected:
rpm-git-tag-sort.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgit2
rpm-git-tag-sort.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency rpm-libs
You mean I shouldn't put them into spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #3 from cli...@gmail.com ---
I made most of changes according to the review.
spec file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
--- Comment #2 from cli...@gmail.com ---
Robert, thank you very much. I will address the issues today. I would argue
that 0.0.git.2.498f832d.dirty.0nub0m is sortable but I will replace it by 0.1
if you agree (I am actually upstream too for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
