https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Petr, can you please give me how to you detect BR ? Have a script or does
(find ... | /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req) could be enough ?
I have no script. I just study
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Thanks for the comments.
I'm still sorry for missing BR (explicit vs implicit...)
All FIX and most TODO applied in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
off topic
Petr, can you please give me how to you detect BR ? Have a script or does (find
... | /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req) could be enough ?
I think I also need to mostly rewrite the BR+R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Source tar ball is original. Ok.
Summary verified from lib/FusionInventory/Agent/Task/Deploy.pm. Ok.
License verified from README and LICENSE. Ok.
URL and Source0 are usable. Ok.
No XS code.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
TODO: Report a bug to upstream about undefined value (Use of uninitialized
value in string eq at
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2012-05-11 11:02:46
EDT ---
Cleanups + filter :
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812587
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
12 matches
Mail list logo
