On Mon Dec 13 09:48:43 CET 2021 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Giacomo Comes schrieb am 12.12.21 um 03:44 Uhr:
> I have more information about the key problem.
>
> Some time ago the package rpm in opensuse was patched with
> a pgp hardening changes from upstream (bsc#1185299)
> This caused a
On 13/12/2021 21.03, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 13.12.21 09:35, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
* Stefan Seyfried schrieb am 12.12.21 um 00:04 Uhr:
...
But yes, signing a new key with the old one is a good idea.
...only if the tools (zypper, yast, rpm) actually accept this "new key
Hi Marc,
On 13.12.21 09:35, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
* Stefan Seyfried schrieb am 12.12.21 um 00:04 Uhr: >> Really the best solution
(if possible) would be if the new key could be
signed by the old one and thus automatically accepted by zypper et al.
I have no idea if this is even possible,
* Giacomo Comes schrieb am 12.12.21 um 03:44 Uhr:
> I have more information about the key problem.
>
> Some time ago the package rpm in opensuse was patched with
> a pgp hardening changes from upstream (bsc#1185299)
> This caused a problem with the current packman key.
> However, the key itselt
* Stefan Seyfried schrieb am 12.12.21 um 00:04 Uhr:
> On 12.12.21 09:20, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > Hi Giacomo,
> >
> > we should really create a new gpg key for the repo.
> >
> > @Stefan: What do you think?
>
> Another Stefan here, but still ;-)
>
> Changing the key should be advertised in
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 11:55:33AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 12/12/2021 11.04, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> >On 12.12.21 09:20, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> >>Hi Giacomo,
> >>
> >>we should really create a new gpg key for the repo.
> >>
> >>@Stefan: What do you think?
> >
> >Another Stefan here,
Hi Marc,
Am Samstag, den 11.12.2021, 22:20 -1000 schrieb Marc Schiffbauer:
> we should really create a new gpg key for the repo.
>
> @Stefan: What do you think?
I am all for it!
PMBS is not in the way, as you are re-signing all
packages on the distribution host. As far as I understand, you have
On 12/12/2021 11.04, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
On 12.12.21 09:20, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
Hi Giacomo,
we should really create a new gpg key for the repo.
@Stefan: What do you think?
Another Stefan here, but still ;-)
Changing the key should be advertised in advance, in prominent places.
On 12.12.21 09:20, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
Hi Giacomo,
we should really create a new gpg key for the repo.
@Stefan: What do you think?
Another Stefan here, but still ;-)
Changing the key should be advertised in advance, in prominent places.
Really the best solution (if possible) would be
Hi Giacomo,
we should really create a new gpg key for the repo.
@Stefan: What do you think?
-Marc
* Giacomo Comes schrieb am 24.10.21 um 19:23 Uhr:
> Hi,
> On Leap 15.3 if I run:
> rpm -K
> the output is usually:
> digests signatures OK
> However if I do that with any rpm from the packman
Hi,
On Leap 15.3 if I run:
rpm -K
the output is usually:
digests signatures OK
However if I do that with any rpm from the packman repository
the output is:
digests SIGNATURES NOT OK
This was not happening before but it started recently after
the package rpm was updated to version
11 matches
Mail list logo