Hi,
this simple addition makes it easy to implement split package support in our
db-scripts.
But it might be a quite useful information anyway and thus not Arch related.
--
Pierre Schmitz
Clemens-August-Straße 76
53115 Bonn
Telefon 0228 9716608
Mobil 0160 95269831
Jabber
Hi,
I think it would be nice to have information about makedepnds available in
each pacakge and the pacakge database. Think about rebuilds (statically
linked) or the question if a certain package can be (re)moved.
--
Pierre Schmitz
Clemens-August-Straße 76
53115 Bonn
Telefon 0228 9
Am Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 10:05:46 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Hi,
>
> this simple addition makes it easy to implement split package support in
> our db-scripts.
>
> But it might be a quite useful information anyway and thus not Arch
> related.
Oh great mailman has stolen my attachement. I need to fin
Am Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 10:08:27 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be nice to have information about makedepnds available in
> each pacakge and the pacakge database. Think about rebuilds (statically
> linked) or the question if a certain package can be (re)moved.
Let's try it inli
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be nice to have information about makedepnds available in
each pacakge and the pacakge database. Think about rebuilds (statically
linked) or the question if a certain package can be (re)moved.
I'm not really a fan of this as it fills the PKGINFO
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi,
this simple addition makes it easy to implement split package support in our
db-scripts.
But it might be a quite useful information anyway and thus not Arch related.
This change I am 50/50 on. pkgbase was supposed to be purely
informational when splitting pac
Am Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 10:28:00 schrieb Allan McRae:
> I'm not really a fan of this as it fills the PKGINFO file and pacman DB
> with info that is really not needed. At the moment you can simply grep
> the ABS tree to check for depends/makedepends.
I am not sure myselfM; that's why I brought it
Am Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 10:39:11 schrieb Allan McRae:
> This change I am 50/50 on. pkgbase was supposed to be purely
> informational when splitting packages and it is entirely optional to
> specify when splitting packages (as pkgname[0] is used as a backup).
> However, I see that could be useful
On Sunday 14 June 2009 10:47:38 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> But here I wonder if such a few bytes more really matter.
To add some facts here. I checked the overhead of adding makedepends to all
packages in core, extra, community and testing, The uncompressed overall size
is 7,9KB and gip compressed
>From 26a3d52910e8c04794789bf2da7855a056a5886f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nagy Gabor
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:00:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Update the documentation of -Qs and -Ss
It was undocumented that multiple regexps are interpreted using logical AND.
Thanks to recurs...@#archlinux for
10 matches
Mail list logo