Re: [PD-dev] Pd-extended-0.43 appearance

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 25, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:36 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Pd vanilla still has different box sizes on different platforms, if I remember correctly, therefore the sizes will have to change somewhere. I made a little test patch and too

Re: [PD-dev] Pd-extended-0.43 appearance

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 25, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:36 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Pd vanilla still has different box sizes on different platforms, if I remember correctly, therefore the sizes will have to change somewhere. I made a little test patch and too

Re: [PD-dev] permission for comitting simple fixes

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I'm OK with you committing to the docs/ subfolder, but I think that's more Jonathan's domain more than me since he's been doing the bulk of the work on that section, especially the doc/pddp section. I can say its OK for you to commit to the doc/tutorials/ section, since I have made 90% o

Re: [PD-dev] permission for comitting simple fixes

2011-10-25 Thread Ricardo Fabbri
Thanks. So how about the 'doc' subdir? Ricardo Fabbri -- Linux registered user #175401 labmacambira.sf.net On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Hey Ricardo, > > It really needs to be on a library-by-library basis, since there are so many > different libraries mai

Re: [PD-dev] permission for comitting simple fixes

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Hey Ricardo, It really needs to be on a library-by-library basis, since there are so many different libraries maintained by many different people. There are two good ways for finding who the maintainer is of a given library: Check who has committed to the library: cd externals/iemlib

[PD-dev] permission for comitting simple fixes

2011-10-25 Thread Ricardo Fabbri
Hans, Starting off the week on Pd. To begin with, do I have your consent to routinely commit small fixes to Pd documentation and code documentation in the SVN community repo, even outside pix_opencv and pdp_opencv? Do I need to forward you my commits or use the patch tracker for details like that

Re: [PD-dev] maximum array display size 2000 points?

2011-10-25 Thread Miller Puckette
Hi all -- There's indeed a limit of 2000 (if drawn as points) or 1000 (if as a polygon) -- this is in lines such as: if (ndrawn > 2000 || ixpix >= 3000) break; and if (ndrawn >= 1000) goto ouch; in plot_vis() in g_template.c. I don't know how far Tcl/Tk can

Re: [PD-dev] Pd without audio device (was: signal object test template for automated unit testing)

2011-10-25 Thread katja
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 22:11 +0200, katja wrote: > >> >> By the way if Pd does not sync with an audio device for whatever >> reason, you get weird test results anyhow. Even if you do not want to >> actually hear the sound, the audio device mus

Re: [PD-dev] maximum array display size 2000 points?

2011-10-25 Thread João Pais
ah you meant where as in which os, and not in which situation? I am in XP, and Katja should be in some kind of linux, afaik. I didn't test it in any other system than mine. On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 15:51 +0200, João Pais wrote: look at the thread, besides explanations there's an example file.

Re: [PD-dev] signal object test template for automated unit testing

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:26 PM, F.J. Kraan wrote: On 2011-10-25 19:01, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Oct 25, 2011, at 11:44 AM, F.J. Kraan wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner> wrote: Ah, course, makes sense. The third item there, the IIR filters, it should

Re: [PD-dev] signal object test template for automated unit testing

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 22:11 +0200, katja wrote: Hans, thanks for your comments On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner > wrote: That looks really good on many levels. :) I like the layout, I hadn't thought of standard dev

Re: [PD-dev] signal object test template for automated unit testing

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 25, 2011, at 11:44 AM, F.J. Kraan wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner> wrote: Ah, course, makes sense. The third item there, the IIR filters, it should be not too hard to reproduce the exact same operation with them too. With the tests, each one is run

Re: [PD-dev] Pd-extended: re-organizing libraries

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
The 'mrpeach' library will remain in Pd-extended for as long as its useful. I don't think 'mrpeach' should be packaged and included in Debian tho. As for libraries included in Pd-extended, this is the central location. Anything without a maintainer will be dropped from Pd- extended if

Re: [PD-dev] Pd-extended-0.43 appearance

2011-10-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 25, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:36 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Pd vanilla still has different box sizes on different platforms, if I remember correctly, therefore the sizes will have to change somewhere. I made a little test patch and too

Re: [PD-dev] signal object test template for automated unit testing

2011-10-25 Thread F.J. Kraan
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Ah, course, makes sense. The third item there, the IIR filters, it should be not too hard to reproduce the exact same operation with them too. With the tests, each one is run in a new Pd instance, so they're always starting

Re: [PD-dev] signal object test template for automated unit testing

2011-10-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 22:11 +0200, katja wrote: > Hans, thanks for your comments > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > > That looks really good on many levels. :) I like the layout, I hadn't > > thought of standard deviation, that makes sense as long as we can

[PD-dev] Pd-extended: re-organizing libraries

2011-10-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Hans I noticed that recent versions of Pd-extended-0.43.1 have some libraries re-organized. For instance, there is an osc and a net library. OTOH, the 'old' mrpeach folder still contains the osc and net object classes. Will they remain there for backwards compatibility reasons or is the plan

[PD-dev] Pd without audio device (was: signal object test template for automated unit testing)

2011-10-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 22:11 +0200, katja wrote: > > By the way if Pd does not sync with an audio device for whatever > reason, you get weird test results anyhow. Even if you do not want to > actually hear the sound, the audio device must work well, for these > signal object tests. That was one of

Re: [PD-dev] maximum array display size 2000 points?

2011-10-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 15:51 +0200, João Pais wrote: > look at the thread, besides explanations there's an example file. Forgive my blindness, but I still couldn't find the answer to my question in the thread. Are you implying it happens on any Pd flavor / OS? ROman > > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 10:5

Re: [PD-dev] maximum array display size 2000 points?

2011-10-25 Thread João Pais
look at the thread, besides explanations there's an example file. On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 10:53 +0200, João Pais wrote: Hi. I just wanted to call the developers' attention to the thread at http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2011-10/092037.html. For a project I'm working on it would be g

Re: [PD-dev] maximum array display size 2000 points?

2011-10-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 10:53 +0200, João Pais wrote: > Hi. I just wanted to call the developers' attention to the thread at > http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2011-10/092037.html. For a > project I'm working on it would be great to know the reasons for this, and > if there is a fix

Re: [PD-dev] Pd-extended-0.43 appearance

2011-10-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:36 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Pd vanilla still has different box sizes on different platforms, if I > remember correctly, therefore the sizes will have to change somewhere. I made a little test patch and took screenshots [1]. On three operating systems (Mac O

[PD-dev] maximum array display size 2000 points?

2011-10-25 Thread João Pais
Hi. I just wanted to call the developers' attention to the thread at http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2011-10/092037.html. For a project I'm working on it would be great to know the reasons for this, and if there is a fix that can be made. Thanks, João Pais ___