I think it's best put as "PCRE *can* be slower", take care
with non-greedy matches and captures in Perl type regex.
For chords I guess you want the first good match anyway,
although that's an assumption.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:01:32 -0400
"Alexandre Quessy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> reg
Hi,
regex uses POSIX regex. pcre uses Perl-like regex, which are more
powerful, but non-standard, I think. PCRE might be slower though.
a
2007/4/26, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I join an old draft patch using my draft [pcre] external. Stands
Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I join an old draft patch using my draft [pcre] external. Stands for
> "perl-compatible regular expressions" which are must robust. It can be
> found in cvs :: externals/aalex/pcre.c
just out of curiosity: how do these differ from the regular expressions
handled
Hi,
It's been a long time I want to parse chord symbols. I started a patch
a long time ago. Now, I think I should make an external out of that :
easier to code... ;)
Anyone has a hint on where to find such regular expression patterns ?
I started this wiki page to put them on :
http://wiki.dataflo
