Re: [PD] compiling pd vanilla on a mac

2013-06-27 Thread Dan Wilcox
... that's why you let automake generate them. :D autools is great *after* you spend tons of time getting it setup *just* right. Until then, it's hell. On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:05 AM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote: > I find configure scripts too complicated for human understanding, and so > I just

Re: [PD] compiling pd vanilla on a mac

2013-06-26 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
>From: Dan Wilcox >To: Jonathan Wilkes >Cc: "pd-list@iem.at list" >Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:24 PM >Subject: Re: [PD] compiling pd vanilla on a mac >Did you install Xcode? Nope!  I thought the compiler itself an

Re: [PD] compiling pd vanilla on a mac

2013-06-26 Thread Dan Wilcox
own box On Jun 26, 2013, at 5:59 PM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote: > From: Jonathan Wilkes > Subject: [PD] compiling pd vanilla on a mac > Date: June 26, 2013 5:47:58 PM EDT > To: pd-list > Reply-To: Jonathan Wilkes > > > Hi, >Any clues about this ./configure erro

Re: [PD] compiling pd vanilla on a mac

2013-06-26 Thread Miller Puckette
I find configure scripts too complicated for human understanding, and so I just use the hand-edited makefile: "make -f makefile.mac", invoked from the /src directory. cheers Miller On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:47:58PM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Hi, >    Any clues about this ./configure err

[PD] compiling pd vanilla on a mac

2013-06-26 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Hi,    Any clues about this ./configure error: configure: error: Couldn't find 10.5, 10.6, or 10.7 SDK configure: error: ./configure failed for portaudio I have no clue how to check what SDK version I have installed (Google returns nothing useful) For reference: After agreeing to some stupid li