I built an analog multiplier module out of the AD633. Datasheet has many
other mathematical functions. See here:
http://macumbista.net/?p=1314
Best,
D.
On 2/3/11 11:07 PM, Tyler Leavitt wrote:
My question is what would be the hardware equivalent of the [*~] object.
I guess it don't have to b
You want it to be bipolar for both signal
and modulator domains.
So that:
+1 * +1 = +1
-1 * +1 = -1
+1 * -1 = -1
-1 * -1 = +1
A linear biased transistor and most simple op-amp
circuits can't give you this. Hence the need for
something like the CA3080 transconductance circuit.
If you jus
till available at http://sharktracks.co.uk/puredata
>
>
> --
> *From:* Tyler Leavitt
> *To:* pd-list
> *Sent:* Thu, 3 February, 2011 22:07:46
> *Subject:* [PD] hardware implementation of [*~]
>
> Hello all,
>
> So I'm getting my feet wet in digital circuit
] hardware implementation of [*~]
Hello all,
So I'm getting my feet wet in digital circuitry this quarter at my university
and I've got numerous projects I want to waste my time on, one of them being a
simple ring mod effect in the same vein as the ring mod found
here: http://en.flossm
You're looking for a balanced modulator. The MC1496 is one.
The original ring modulator used a ring of 4 diodes between two transformers.
Running two pulse waves into an AND gate will give a binary version.
Martin
>
> Hello all,
>
> So I'm getting my feet wet in digital circuitry this quarter a
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Tyler Leavitt wrote:
My question is what would be the hardware equivalent of the [*~] object.
I guess it don't have to be digital... even an analog equivalent would
help me understand it better.
Isn't the transistor related to [*~] ?
But it depends which case of [*~], I s
Hello all,
So I'm getting my feet wet in digital circuitry this quarter at my
university and I've got numerous projects I want to waste my time on, one of
them being a simple ring mod effect in the same vein as the ring mod found
here: http://en.flossmanuals.net/PureData/AmplitudeModulation
My qu
