A little poll:
-According to you, what is THE feature/fonction/object that Pd misses the most?
-What Pd feature/fonction/object causes you the most problems?
Thanks for your contribution!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/schafferdavid/
http://audioblog.arteradio.com/David_Schaffer/__
On Sun Jan 13, 2008 at 12:35:38PM +0100, David Schaffer wrote:
> A little poll:
>
> -According to you, what is THE feature/fonction/object that Pd misses the
> most?
uniformity in implementation allowing reuse and clean abstraction across the
levels. with blackbox objects written in C, orthogo
Quoting cdr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> -What Pd feature/fonction/object causes you the most problems?
>
> lack of proper 64 bit support
what are you missing?
gmadsr
IOhannes
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging P
who has problems with crashing?
on os x, pd is super stable for me. don't think i've ever had a crash
unless i did something really stupid.
does it crash on linux or windows???
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
h
hard off a écrit :
> who has problems with crashing?
>
>
> on os x, pd is super stable for me. don't think i've ever had a crash
> unless i did something really stupid.
>
>
> does it crash on linux or windows???
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 12:35 +0100, David Schaffer wrote:
> A little poll:
>
> -According to you, what is THE feature/fonction/object that Pd misses
> the most?
A formal dynamic patching interface. I would like what is possible in
Chuck and SuperCollider with regard to dynamic instantiation and
