Re: [PD] shrinking subpatches!?

I'm on 0.47.1 on Windows 7 and it shrinks. > Subject: [PD] shrinking subpatches!? > > in the project I'm working on I have a couple of subpatches which shrink > vertically whenever I close and open them... > I made a funny little patch to demonstrate the issue. can anyone reproduce > this on

Re: [PD] shrinking subpatches!?

doesn't shrink macOS 10.12.6, pd 0.48-1 2018-04-05 18:04 GMT-03:00 Lucas Cordiviola : > It shrinks here. > > 0.48-1 > > Win 8.1 > > Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. > > On 4/5/2018 5:55 PM, Christof Ressi wrote: > > in the project I'm working on I have a couple

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

2018-04-05 16:17 GMT-03:00 Dan Wilcox : > test? https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/346 > wow, didn't see that coming :) THANKS! Well, since I opened this thread and mentioned I wanted to do such a Pull Request, let me respond so some issues raised here. One

[PD] shrinking subpatches!?

in the project I'm working on I have a couple of subpatches which shrink vertically whenever I close and open them... I made a funny little patch to demonstrate the issue. can anyone reproduce this on his/her machine? I'm on Pd 0.48.1 Windows 7 shrink-test.pd Description: Binary data

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

test? https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/346 Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

>>>What is wrong with [my_selector(--[list]--[$1( >> for instance, [42(--[list]--[$1( will give 42 not float, >> similarly [symbol crabs(--[list]--[$1( will give crabs not symbol > >Also it seems reasonable to just have 1 object box for querying a selector, > >which is a main element of

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

I don't understand this whole thing about getting the selector of a message to a msgbox and why this could be a useful feature. can someone give me a real world example? when I have a msgbox like [foo $1 $2 $3 $4( I expect the input to be a list of (at least) 4 atoms which is then expanded.

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

>>What is wrong with [my_selector(--[list]--[$1( > for instance, [42(--[list]--[$1( will give 42 not float, > similarly [symbol > crabs(--[list]--[$1( will give crabs not symbol > Also it seems reasonable to > just have 1 object box for querying a selector, > which is a main element of > the pd

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

>> whereas you cannot get an abstraction's selector (which would >> be handy >> for error reporting).  > What is the selector of an abstraction? [my_abs arg1 arg2] The selector is "my_abs". The reason consistency probably keeps coming up is because everything on the Pd canvas as well as Pd

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

>What is wrong with [my_selector(--[list]--[$1( for instance, [42(--[list]--[$1( will give 42 not float, similarly [symbol crabs(--[list]--[$1( will give crabs not symbol Also it seems reasonable to just have 1 object box for querying a selector, which is a main element of the pd message

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

On 2018-04-05 13:44, Roman Haefeli wrote: > I already pointed out that dollar variables > are a totally different thing in messages and objects. they are very much the same (from Pd's POV). > >> whereas you cannot get an abstraction's selector (which would  >> be handy for error reporting).  >

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

yes, great to say that, chris: thank you so much miller for the wonderful pure data! hans > Am 05.04.2018 um 12:53 schrieb Chris McCormick : > > Anyway, I'm sorry to conjure up the spectacle of another several decades of > challenging software development and maintenance

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

On 03/04/18 03:02, Miller Puckette wrote: shouldn't this be expanded into a full-on scripting language? Heck yes! For audio vectors the dataflow paradigm is glorious. But building k-rate algorithms and logic with a mouse makes one i-rate (a bit weird to whinge about this when I choose to

Re: [PD] suggestion: $0 in messages

On 03/04/18 21:52, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote: When users for a decade have said they wanted $0 in msg boxes, they mean that they want to use Pd's notion of send-symbol locality inside message boxes. They want that instead of manually querying the value of a reserved dollarsign variable